Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 2.7] Fix getAlerts RBAC problem (#991) #998

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2023

Conversation

opensearch-trigger-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

Backport c535349 from #997

Signed-off-by: Ashish Agrawal <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c535349)
@lezzago lezzago changed the title [Backport 2.7] [Backport 2.x] Fix getAlerts RBAC problem (#991) [Backport 2.7] Fix getAlerts RBAC problem (#991) Jul 11, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 11, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #998 (c75091c) into 2.7 (19869b0) will decrease coverage by 0.17%.
The diff coverage is 61.11%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.7     #998      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     76.85%   76.68%   -0.17%     
  Complexity      116      116              
============================================
  Files           125      125              
  Lines          7253     7257       +4     
  Branches       1049     1050       +1     
============================================
- Hits           5574     5565       -9     
- Misses         1144     1156      +12     
- Partials        535      536       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rch/alerting/transport/TransportGetAlertsAction.kt 74.07% <61.11%> (-2.85%) ⬇️

... and 6 files with indirect coverage changes

@lezzago lezzago merged commit 65c3d3a into 2.7 Jul 11, 2023
13 of 16 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot deleted the backport/backport-997-to-2.7 branch July 11, 2023 22:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants