Simplify proposal process #1336
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Archives artifacts from previous proposal process - Fixes all links to previous proposal to use permalinks instead (These links rely on GitHub forwarding HTTP requests as repositories are renamed or moved to different orgs).
ljharb
reviewed
Jul 14, 2024
ljharb
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2024
timmywil
approved these changes
Jul 14, 2024
|
Alright. I think I fixed all link issues now. [Narrator: "he hadn't"] Thanks for raising this, folks. |
|
I wonder if the past proposal have any context that should still be available somewhere? Don't feel too strongly one way or the other but thought I'd mentioned it. |
WaleedAshraf
approved these changes
Jul 19, 2024
VoltrexKeyva
approved these changes
Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The CPC is no longer using the formal proposal process outlined in the proposals directory so it made sense to retire it. Additionally, this PR: