-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.9k
8358330: AsmRemarks and DbgStrings clear() method may not get called before their destructor #25598
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…before their destructor Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <[email protected]>
👋 Welcome back asmehra! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@ashu-mehra This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 40 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@ashu-mehra The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
@vnkozlov can you please review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not comfortable that you are changing code not used by AOT.
Can you consider populate CodeBlob::_asm_remarks
and _dbg_strings
after calling CodeBlob::create()
? Then you don't need temporary AsmRemarks
and DbgStrings
.
That would work as well. CodeBlob::_asm_remarks::_remarks need to be allocated memory explicitly in this case. I will add AsmRemarks::init() to allocate memory for and initialize AsmRemarks::_remarks. |
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Mehra <[email protected]>
@ashu-mehra this pull request can not be integrated into git checkout JDK-8358330
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push |
@vnkozlov I have updated the changes. Can you please review again. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good. Let me test it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My testing passed.
@vnkozlov thanks for testing and reviewing. |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit fd0ab04.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@ashu-mehra Pushed as commit fd0ab04. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
This patch fixes a possible assert in debug builds if the allocation of memory for a CodeBlob fails when loading it from the AOT Code Cache. See description of JDK-8358330 for more details.
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25598/head:pull/25598
$ git checkout pull/25598
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25598
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25598/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25598
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25598
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25598.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment