Skip to content

8358171: Additional code coverage for PEM API #25588

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fguallini
Copy link
Member

@fguallini fguallini commented Jun 2, 2025

The tests included in this PR add code coverage mainly to the following classes introduced/updated by JEP 470 (PEM): PEMDecoder, PEMEncoder, Pem, EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo and the Key factories. In addition, more tests are included for RSAPSS, multithreading, jdk.epkcs8.defaultAlgorithm property and some negative testing


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8358171: Additional code coverage for PEM API (Enhancement - P3)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25588/head:pull/25588
$ git checkout pull/25588

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25588
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25588/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25588

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25588

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25588.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 2, 2025

👋 Welcome back fguallini! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 2, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 2, 2025

@fguallini The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@fguallini fguallini marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2025 15:13
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 2, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 2, 2025

Webrevs

String algorithm = switch(privateKey.getAlgorithm()) {
case "EC" -> "SHA256withECDSA";
case "EdDSA" -> "EdDSA";
case "RSASSA-PSS" -> {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
case "RSASSA-PSS" -> {
case "RSASSA-PSS" -> {


public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
PEMEncoder encoder = PEMEncoder.of();
try(ExecutorService ex = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(THREAD_COUNT)) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
try(ExecutorService ex = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(THREAD_COUNT)) {
try (ExecutorService ex = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(THREAD_COUNT)) {

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
rfr Pull request is ready for review security [email protected]
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants