Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8323100: com/sun/tools/attach/StartManagementAgent.java failed with "WaitForSingleObject failed" #24346

Closed

Conversation

dholmes-ora
Copy link
Member

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora commented Apr 1, 2025

See bug report for gory details.

Short version: in the Windows version of VirtualMachineImpl::execute, if an exception occurred after we created the SocketInputStreamImpl (which is the test scenario of the failing test), we would close the native HANDLE to the pipe twice. But after the first close the HANDLE could be reassigned to another object (e.g. the _ParkHandle of the StreamPumper thread) and the second close would close that HANDLE resulting in the failure of WaitForSingleObject. (Other failure modes with different invalid handles have also been seen.)

Fix: shorten the outer try/catch block so that we only directly close the pipe if the IOException happens before we create the SocketStreamImpl - after which the closing of the stream will close the pipe HANDLE.

Testing:

  • ran the com/sun/tools/attach tets group 2500 times without failure
  • tiers 3-5 as a sanity check (Windows only)

Thanks


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8323100: com/sun/tools/attach/StartManagementAgent.java failed with "WaitForSingleObject failed" (Bug - P3)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24346/head:pull/24346
$ git checkout pull/24346

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24346
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24346/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24346

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24346

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24346.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 1, 2025

👋 Welcome back dholmes! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 1, 2025

@dholmes-ora This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8323100: com/sun/tools/attach/StartManagementAgent.java failed with "WaitForSingleObject failed"

Reviewed-by: kevinw, amenkov

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 15 new commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 07fd666: 8342984: Bump minimum boot jdk to JDK 24
  • 6a46d55: 8353129: CDS ArchiveRelocation tests fail after JDK-8325132
  • 19eabaf: 8353227: JFR: Prepare tests for strong parser validation
  • 564066d: 8353118: Deprecate the use of java.locale.useOldISOCodes system property
  • a1ab1d8: 8353449: [BACKOUT] One instance of STATIC_LIB_CFLAGS was missed in JDK-8345683
  • 2a31f69: 8353331: Test ForkJoinPool20Test::testFixedDelaySequence is failing
  • 1809138: 8352284: EXTRA_CFLAGS incorrectly applied to BUILD_LIBJVM src/hotspot C++ source files
  • cef5610: 8353272: One instance of STATIC_LIB_CFLAGS was missed in JDK-8345683
  • 6801eb8: 8352709: Remove bad timing annotations from WhileOpTest.java
  • 85a0baf: 8352719: Add an equals sign to the modules statement
  • ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/860a789e9153448345f19d70dd07e294a0b62223...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 1, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 1, 2025

@dholmes-ora The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 1, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent to have this found, they just looked like an "impossible" failures. 8-)

Also good lessons in naming and commenting around processCompletionStatus.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 1, 2025
@dholmes-ora
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the review @kevinjwalls !

@dholmes-ora
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for the review @alexmenkov !

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Going to push as commit e6fe249.
Since your change was applied there have been 19 commits pushed to the master branch:

  • 096e70d: 8352437: Support --add-exports with -XX:+AOTClassLinking
  • 6970cf6: 8352775: JVM crashes with -XX:AOTMode=create -XX:+UseZGC
  • afcad8c: 5043343: FileImageInputStream and FileImageOutputStream do not properly track streamPos for RandomAccessFile
  • 6891490: 8353324: Clean up of comments and import after 8319192
  • 07fd666: 8342984: Bump minimum boot jdk to JDK 24
  • 6a46d55: 8353129: CDS ArchiveRelocation tests fail after JDK-8325132
  • 19eabaf: 8353227: JFR: Prepare tests for strong parser validation
  • 564066d: 8353118: Deprecate the use of java.locale.useOldISOCodes system property
  • a1ab1d8: 8353449: [BACKOUT] One instance of STATIC_LIB_CFLAGS was missed in JDK-8345683
  • 2a31f69: 8353331: Test ForkJoinPool20Test::testFixedDelaySequence is failing
  • ... and 9 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/860a789e9153448345f19d70dd07e294a0b62223...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 2, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 2, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 2, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 2, 2025

@dholmes-ora Pushed as commit e6fe249.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@dholmes-ora dholmes-ora deleted the 8323100-waitForSingleObject branch April 2, 2025 02:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
integrated Pull request has been integrated serviceability [email protected]
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants