Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Initial draft of PC for Verilator modeling for software. #694

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jeremybennett
Copy link
Contributor

Project-Descriptions-and-Plans/Verilator-models-for-software/

* images/avr-studio.png: Created.
* verilator-models-for-software-pc.md: Created.

Project-Descriptions-and-Plans/Verilator-models-for-software/

	* images/avr-studio.png: Created.
	* verilator-models-for-software-pc.md: Created.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Bennett <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a license header for this file. The SPDX two-liner is sufficient:

<!---
Copyright 2024 Embecosm, OpenHW Group
SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH SHL-2.1
--->

Copy link
Contributor

@davideschiavone davideschiavone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, general comment, would it make sense to add the Verilator version?


From the [Verilator Wikipedia entry](https://www.veripool.org/wiki/verilator):

> Verilator is a free and open-source software tool capable of converting Synthesizable Verilog/SystemVerilog to a cycle-accurate cycle-accurate, 2-state behavioral model in C++ or SystemC.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cycle-accurate is written twice

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants