-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: adds CourseAboutPageURLRequested and LMSPageURLRequested filters #35142
feat: adds CourseAboutPageURLRequested and LMSPageURLRequested filters #35142
Conversation
Thanks for the pull request, @jignaciopm! What's next?Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review: 🔘 Get product approvalIf you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.
🔘 Provide contextTo help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:
🔘 Get a green buildIf one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green. 🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:Who will review my changes?This repository is currently maintained by Where can I find more information?If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:
When can I expect my changes to be merged?Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible. However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:
💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. |
51bfa7a
to
9995472
Compare
Hi @jignaciopm! Just flagging there are some failing checks here. |
099e882
to
20a0c38
Compare
@jignaciopm Looks like there's a failed check. |
Hey, @jignaciopm, thanks for contributing this! Those testing instructions are a bit out of date. Could you please include them directly in the cover letter, update and simplify them? Thanks! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll review this in detail once you apply the changes from the openedx-filters PR and all comments there are resolved. Thank you!
992d984
to
21d07f3
Compare
21d07f3
to
3fdfce1
Compare
3fdfce1
to
f4570a3
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm preparing my environment to test this. Thanks!
@jignaciopm: Could you make the necessary adjustments so I can test this locally, mainly in eox-tenant? Or please update the testing instructions so I can test another way. Thank you! |
f4570a3
to
b6a94d9
Compare
b4acb73
to
5a0c734
Compare
Here's how I've been testing this:
To save configuration time, instead of using eox-tenant as you suggested in the test instructions, I created a simple step that replaces the URL for different domain another-lms.local.edly.io:
By doing a quick search I found the list of places these two filters should cover. Please, let me know if I missed one. CourseAboutPageURLRequested here's what I found by searching
LMSPageURLRequested here's what I found by searching
@jignaciopm: please, let me know in a comment once you address the suggestions so I can test again. |
5a0c734
to
b409d20
Compare
@mariajgrimaldi do can you try again please? |
93eb97b
to
7fae713
Compare
Thank you, @jignaciopm, for addressing all my comments. I tested this again following the instructions I left here, and it seems to work fine. Now, please update the test docstrings because they seem to be out of date. I'll leave my approval afterward. |
90f5924
to
98159aa
Compare
Thank you so much for adding more extension points to enable seamless integrations! While this solution, along with the pipeline steps you've implemented in your plugin, addresses the lack of org-awareness, it also raises a broader question of whether Studio should be more organization-aware overall. In some places, configurations are applied site-wide, while the organization context is considered in others. Although this discussion goes beyond the scope of this proposal, it’s an important conversation to have. For now, let's put a pin in that and move forward with this solution. |
2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX staging environment in preparation for a release to production. |
2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX production environment. |
1 similar comment
2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX production environment. |
2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX staging environment in preparation for a release to production. |
2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX production environment. |
1 similar comment
2U Release Notice: This PR has been deployed to the edX production environment. |
Description
This PR introduces two new openedx-filters event
org.openedx.course_authoring.lms.page.url.requested.v1
andorg.openedx.learning.course_about.page.url.requested.v1
. This is implemented to guaranty multi tenancy in eox-tenant in LMS_ROOT_URL from Studio to LMS, but eox-tenant is only an example would consider use.Impact by the change on:
Supporting information
There are not openedx related tickets. The related PR are:
Testing instructions
The change can be tested with testing instructions in eduNEXT/eox-tenant#219.
Deadline
"None"
Other information
Warning: Once accepted this PR, it has to be merged only after openedx/openedx-filters#200 is merged and the requirements in this PR are updated.
Settings