Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

model/profile: add frame.type for Erlang #1735

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

florianl
Copy link
Contributor

Changes

Please provide a brief description of the changes here.

FYI @open-telemetry/profiling-maintainers

Merge requirement checklist

Extend the list of known frame types with a value for Erlang.

Signed-off-by: Florian Lehner <[email protected]>
@florianl florianl force-pushed the profile-frame-type-beam branch from d2d8a1b to 542d56a Compare January 10, 2025 10:09
- id: beam
brief: >
[Erlang](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BEAM_(Erlang_virtual_machine))
value: "beam"
Copy link
Contributor Author

@florianl florianl Jan 10, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please see this discussion https://github.com/open-telemetry/semantic-conventions/pull/1188/files#r1722087658 on why beam was chosen as value here rather than erlang (for the language).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/cc @tsloughter @bryannaegele and other @open-telemetry/erlang-approvers in case they have any thoughts

@trask
Copy link
Member

trask commented Jan 10, 2025

cc @open-telemetry/profiling-approvers

.chloggen/profile-frame-type-beam.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
- id: beam
brief: >
[Erlang](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BEAM_(Erlang_virtual_machine))
value: "beam"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/cc @tsloughter @bryannaegele and other @open-telemetry/erlang-approvers in case they have any thoughts

@trask
Copy link
Member

trask commented Jan 21, 2025

moving to draft and back, to see if that will give profiling approvers green checkmark

@trask trask marked this pull request as draft January 21, 2025 01:10
@trask trask marked this pull request as ready for review January 21, 2025 01:10
@trask
Copy link
Member

trask commented Jan 21, 2025

one more try (closing and re-opening) 🤷‍♂️

@trask trask closed this Jan 21, 2025
@trask trask reopened this Jan 21, 2025
@trask
Copy link
Member

trask commented Jan 21, 2025

ah, will fix...

Unknown owner on line 114: make sure the team @open-telemetry/profiling-approvers exists, is publicly visible, and has write access to the repository
…metry/specs-semconv-approvers @open-telemetry/profiling-approvers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants