Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "refactor: use uv to resolve dependencies" #41

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 11, 2024

Conversation

ethanholz
Copy link
Contributor

This reverts commit 57b7c20.

Consider the uv test a fail. This requires more work to get implemented than I am willing to put into this.

@ethanholz ethanholz self-assigned this Nov 11, 2024
@ethanholz ethanholz requested a review from dwhswenson November 11, 2024 22:09
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 94.73%. Comparing base (57b7c20) to head (5b3999f).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #41   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.73%   94.73%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         304      304           
=======================================
  Hits          288      288           
  Misses         16       16           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 94.73% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@dwhswenson dwhswenson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, it was worth a try, at least!

@dwhswenson dwhswenson merged commit fb43049 into omsf-eco-infra:main Nov 11, 2024
5 checks passed
@ethanholz ethanholz deleted the revert/uv branch November 11, 2024 22:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants