-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
added python notebook #2
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
interactive analysis for with the survey BLOG post
Thanks, @amwink ! Just to confirm : I think this is all content that's currently inside the repository. Is the main change you're proposing adding a .ipynb rendering of the .md file ? If so, this is what the jupytext header on this file is for -- it automagically (😉 ) opens the file as a jupyter notebook in environments with jupyter installed, like My Binder. If there's something else that I'm not seeing in reviewing these files, though, please let me know ! |
Ah no, my understanding of Binder was just that it imports a repository with .ipynb notebooks (so nothing would happen if your repository does not have a notebook). So the markdown file is 'jupitext'? |
Yes, exactly ! Jupytext is useful generally for working with notebook files, especially under version control. I've set up the markdown file to be Myst Markdown, which has the added benefit that Binder can natively understand it. So, the screenshot I had shared of the running notebook was on Binder, using the repo as-is ! |
Understood. The notebook runs al the scripts from start (reading the csv) to finish (the p-values). If all those strips are in the .md then the ipynb is redundant. |
for the survey BLOG post