Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump core-js from 3.23.3 to 3.28.0 #3073

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 14, 2023

Bumps core-js from 3.23.3 to 3.28.0.

Changelog

Sourced from core-js's changelog.

3.28.0 - 2023.02.14

I highly recommend reading this: So, what's next?

  • Change Array by copy proposal:
    • Methods:
      • Array.prototype.toReversed
      • Array.prototype.toSorted
      • Array.prototype.toSpliced
      • Array.prototype.with
      • %TypedArray%.prototype.toReversed
      • %TypedArray%.prototype.toSorted
      • %TypedArray%.prototype.with
    • Moved to stable ES, January 2023 TC39 meeting
    • Added es. namespace modules, /es/ and /stable/ namespaces entries
  • Added JSON.parse source text access Stage 3 proposal
    • Methods:
      • JSON.parse patched for support source in reviver function arguments
      • JSON.rawJSON
      • JSON.isRawJSON
      • JSON.stringify patched for support JSON.rawJSON
  • Added ArrayBuffer.prototype.transfer and friends Stage 3 proposal:
    • Built-ins:
      • ArrayBuffer.prototype.detached
      • ArrayBuffer.prototype.transfer (only in runtimes with native structuredClone with ArrayBuffer transfer support)
      • ArrayBuffer.prototype.transferToFixedLength (only in runtimes with native structuredClone with ArrayBuffer transfer support)
    • In backwards, in runtimes with native ArrayBuffer.prototype.transfer, but without proper structuredClone, added ArrayBuffer transfer support to structuredClone polyfill
  • Iterator Helpers proposal:
  • Explicit Resource Management Stage 3 and Async Explicit Resource Management Stage 2 proposals:
  • Added Symbol predicates Stage 2 proposal
    • Methods:
      • Symbol.isRegistered
      • Symbol.isWellKnown
  • Number.range Stage 1 proposal and method renamed to Iterator.range
  • Function.prototype.unThis Stage 0 proposal and method renamed to Function.prototype.demethodize
  • Fixed Safari String.prototype.toWellFormed ToString conversion bug
  • Improved some cases handling of array-replacer in JSON.stringify symbols handling fix
  • Fixed many other old JSON.{ parse, stringify } bugs (numbers instead of strings as keys in replacer, handling negative zeroes, spaces, some more handling symbols cases, etc.)
  • Fixed configurability and ToString conversion of some accessors
  • Added throwing proper errors on an incorrect context in some ArrayBuffer and DataView methods
  • Some minor DataView and %TypedArray% polyfills optimizations
  • Added proper error on the excess number of trailing = in the atob polyfill
  • Fixed theoretically possible ReDoS vulnerabilities in String.prototype.{ trim, trimEnd, trimRight }, parse(Int|Float), Number, atob, and URL polyfills in some ancient engines
  • Compat data improvements:
    • RegExp.prototype.flags marked as fixed from V8 ~ Chrome 111
    • Added Opera Android 73 compat data mapping
  • Added TypeScript definitions to core-js-builder

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 6f721fa refresh
  • 93ad467 3.28.0
  • 91e0347 so, what's next?
  • 39c079b throw proper errors on an incorrect context in some ArrayBuffer and `DataVi...
  • 7e0399d some fixes
  • 139abbf add ArrayBuffer.prototype.transfer and friends Stage 3 proposal
  • 44cf9e8 fix theoretically possible ReDoS vulnerabilities
  • 2e44954 fix Safari 9 JSON.parse bug with handling negative zero + some whitespaces
  • be7ea2c improve handling of strings wrapped to rawJSON
  • e21fe93 add some tests
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [core-js](https://github.com/zloirock/core-js/tree/HEAD/packages/core-js) from 3.23.3 to 3.28.0.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/zloirock/core-js/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/zloirock/core-js/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/zloirock/core-js/commits/v3.28.0/packages/core-js)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: core-js
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot @github
Copy link
Author

dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Feb 27, 2023

Superseded by #3076.

@dependabot dependabot bot closed this Feb 27, 2023
@dependabot dependabot bot deleted the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/core-js-3.28.0 branch February 27, 2023 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants