Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix-debug-classification #700

Closed

Conversation

HarryandJack
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How has this been tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have applied tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@@ -68,11 +68,204 @@
},
Copy link
Contributor

@WHQWHQWHQ WHQWHQWHQ Dec 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why change cos-cloud link?


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -68,11 +68,204 @@
},
Copy link
Contributor

@WHQWHQWHQ WHQWHQWHQ Dec 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

UsageError: Line magic function %hide_result not found.

In your jupyter environment,this command might not be a standard or built-in command .


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -68,11 +68,204 @@
},
Copy link
Contributor

@WHQWHQWHQ WHQWHQWHQ Dec 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line #16.      f = plt.figure(figsize=(10,4))

follow black format(10, 4)


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -68,11 +68,204 @@
},
Copy link
Contributor

@WHQWHQWHQ WHQWHQWHQ Dec 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

UsageError: Line magic function %hide_result not found.

same problem as above.


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -68,11 +68,204 @@
},
Copy link
Contributor

@WHQWHQWHQ WHQWHQWHQ Jan 1, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line #1.    it's empty line,just delete it.

Reply via ReviewNB

@WHQWHQWHQ
Copy link
Contributor

1704148542739
click “Resolve conversation”after resolving.

@HarryandJack HarryandJack deleted the fix-debug-classification branch March 28, 2024 05:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants