Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

module: simplify --inspect-brk handling #55679

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 3, 2024

Conversation

joyeecheung
Copy link
Member

Previously in the CommonJS loader, --inspect-brk is implemented checking whether the module points to the result of re-resolving process.argv[1] to determine whether the module is the entry point. This is unnecessarily complex, especially now that we store that information in the module as kIsMainSymbol. This patch updates it to simply check that symbol property instead.

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/loaders

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added module Issues and PRs related to the module subsystem. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Nov 1, 2024
@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Nov 1, 2024
Previously in the CommonJS loader, --inspect-brk is implemented
checking whether the module points to the result of re-resolving
process.argv[1] to determine whether the module is the entry point.
This is unnecessarily complex, especially now that we store that
information in the module as kIsMainSymbol. This patch updates
it to simply check that symbol property instead.
@github-actions github-actions bot added request-ci-failed An error occurred while starting CI via request-ci label, and manual interventon is needed. and removed request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. labels Nov 1, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Failed to start CI
   ⚠  No approving reviews found
   ✘  Refusing to run CI on potentially unsafe PR
https://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/11633317121

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 1, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.42%. Comparing base (53b1050) to head (d479570).
Report is 65 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             main   #55679    +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage   88.42%   88.42%            
========================================
  Files         654      654            
  Lines      187552   187686   +134     
  Branches    36087    36132    +45     
========================================
+ Hits       165839   165968   +129     
+ Misses      14950    14946     -4     
- Partials     6763     6772     +9     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
lib/internal/modules/cjs/loader.js 97.96% <100.00%> (+0.31%) ⬆️

... and 50 files with indirect coverage changes

@marco-ippolito marco-ippolito added request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. and removed request-ci-failed An error occurred while starting CI via request-ci label, and manual interventon is needed. labels Nov 2, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Nov 2, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@joyeecheung joyeecheung added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Nov 2, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Nov 3, 2024
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 8ab3140 into nodejs:main Nov 3, 2024
59 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 8ab3140

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
module Issues and PRs related to the module subsystem. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants