Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move checks to project.ncl #152

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2023
Merged

Move checks to project.ncl #152

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2023

Conversation

YorikSar
Copy link
Collaborator

It's unclear if we need to implement runCommand ourselves, it's quite simple to achieve necesary result with plaing NixpkgsPkg override.

Introduce NixEnvironmentVariable contract to handle all possible things than might end up in env.

Part of #58.

It's unclear if we need to implement runCommand ourselves, it's quite
simple to achieve necesary result with plaing NixpkgsPkg override.

Introduce NixEnvironmentVariable contract to handle all possible things
than might end up in `env`.

Part of #58.
@YorikSar
Copy link
Collaborator Author

YorikSar commented Oct 3, 2023

@thufschmitt Since #153 is blocked on Nickel issue, should we roll this back to using the big contract on Nickel side to move the rest of the chain forward?

@thufschmitt
Copy link
Member

Yes you're right, let's do that for the time being

@YorikSar YorikSar marked this pull request as ready for review October 3, 2023 18:10
@thufschmitt thufschmitt added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 4, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit ac35212 Oct 4, 2023
2 checks passed
@thufschmitt thufschmitt deleted the nickel-checks branch October 4, 2023 14:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants