Settings: invert edit simple checkbox #6555
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Grigory Vodyanov <[email protected]>
GVodyanov
requested review from
SebastianKrupinski,
st3iny and
tcitworld
as code owners
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6555 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 23.44% 23.44%
Complexity 472 472
=========================================
Files 249 249
Lines 11888 11888
Branches 2282 2271 -11
=========================================
Hits 2787 2787
Misses 8774 8774
Partials 327 327
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
SebastianKrupinski
approved these changes
Dec 9, 2024
|
Back port? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Found by @alexanderdd, currently the checkbox does the opposite of what it should