Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Run tests with jest which allows easy code coverage reports #166

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2023

Conversation

susnux
Copy link
Contributor

@susnux susnux commented Jul 5, 2023

Run tests using jest, which makes it easy to generate code coverage reports. Also update the node-tests workflow from organization template

Run tests using jest, which makes it easy to generate code coverage reports.
Also update the `node-tests` workflow from organization template

Signed-off-by: Ferdinand Thiessen <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 5, 2023

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@fab6dd3). Click here to learn what that means.
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #166   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   77.77%           
=========================================
  Files             ?        5           
  Lines             ?       54           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?       42           
  Misses            ?       12           
  Partials          ?        0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@skjnldsv skjnldsv merged commit 92783fa into master Jul 6, 2023
6 checks passed
@skjnldsv skjnldsv deleted the feat/run-tests-with-jest-for-code-coverage branch July 6, 2023 06:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants