Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor(agent): cleanup guzzle instrumentation #498
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
refactor(agent): cleanup guzzle instrumentation #498
Changes from 12 commits
d04bf87
4c98d5a
ca5c948
a20c93d
4b45445
734784e
48f8e9e
6ac5c13
d4dea40
566b26e
6a879ff
6222a51
29f4551
8065805
40ab8cf
f3ac653
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This file needs to be clang formatted
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems unnecessary. Instead,
#include "ext/standard/php_versioning.h"
should be added to the#include
statementsThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't seem the right approach. Luckily declaration (and initialization) on line 348 creates char array of exactly the size enough to fit this strcpy. Maybe consider turning guzzle_path into a function that will return const char * based on guzzle_version? Something like this:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, I also agree that using nr_strcpy is not the most efficient way. I have fixed this by removing the guzzle version from the namespace! 40ab8cf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see
eval
being freed...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed! 40ab8cf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see
guzzle_ver
being freed...There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed 40ab8cf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this code can be simplified further because
nr_guzzle6_client_construct
andnr_guzzle7_client_construct
are actuallynr_guzzle_client_construct_helper
. Also I don't think the guzzle_version needs to be used in any of the New Relic instrumenting namespaces or class names. This would simplify the code and reduce memory allocations.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, that is a great point! I have simplified the code 40ab8cf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe add a brief doc comment describing what this function does? I.e. it adds
newrelic\Guzzle\middleware
to theGuzzleHttp\Client
handler stack.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good idea! I have added a brief description that describes what this function is doing f3ac653
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does
version
need to be freed?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, version also needs to be freed because the nr_guzzle_version function allocates memory for a new string and does not free it, which means the caller is responsible for freeing the result. 29f4551
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see this being freed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for pointing that out! Since guzzle version is not needed in the namespace, I will not have to use nr_formatf() anymore. 40ab8cf
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see
error_message
being freed.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixed! 29f4551
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.