Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

permit custom device requests #3

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

permit custom device requests #3

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

zeppelinen
Copy link
Collaborator

Karpenter is negative towards custom device requests it is unaware of, assuming those cannot be scheduled.

fixes kubernetes-sigs/karpenter#751

This changes the request handling to be scoped only to resource request that Karpenter is aware of and actively manages. The reasoning here is that it cannot influence those resource requests anyways, they come into existance by means of other concepts such as the device-plugin manager that even might be late bound and thus it is out of scope.

Fixes #

Description

How was this change tested?

Does this change impact docs?

  • Yes, PR includes docs updates
  • Yes, issue opened: #
  • No

Release Note


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

Karpenter is negative towards custom device requests it is unaware of, assuming those cannot be scheduled.

fixes #1900

This changes the request handling to be scoped only to resource request that Karpenter is aware of and actively manages. The reasoning here is that it cannot influence those resource requests anyways, they come into existance by means of other concepts such as the device-plugin manager that even might be late bound and thus it is out of scope.
@zeppelinen zeppelinen self-assigned this Dec 14, 2022
@cvpatel
Copy link

cvpatel commented Apr 10, 2023

@universam1 @zeppelinen Are you thinking of pushing this upstream? We are thinking of something similar but want to know if you have any plans or if you've had conversations with community about it?

@cvpatel
Copy link

cvpatel commented Apr 10, 2023

@universam1 @zeppelinen Are you thinking of pushing this upstream? We are thinking of something similar but want to know if you have any plans or if you've had conversations with community about it?

NVM, just needed to read middle of the thread on main issue and original PR...

@zeppelinen
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@cvpatel It's work in progress at the moment. Plan is to merge few more PRs and maintain this fork for a while until it's implemented upstream.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Mega Issue: Karpenter doesnt support custom resources requests/limit
3 participants