Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Strip unnecessary ClientInfo fields from stream & consumer assignment proposals #6326

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

neilalexander
Copy link
Member

This avoids JWTs etc from the client info from being encoded into stream and consumer assignments proposals when they are not needed.

This will reduce the network bandwidth required to send such proposals in some deployments, as well as reducing the memory footprint of proposals queued in memory and the disk footprint required for the metalayer WAL.

Signed-off-by: Neil Twigg [email protected]

@neilalexander neilalexander requested a review from a team as a code owner January 6, 2025 14:06
server/events.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/jetstream_cluster.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/jetstream_cluster.go Show resolved Hide resolved
server/jetstream_cluster.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
server/jetstream_cluster.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
server/jetstream_cluster.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@neilalexander
Copy link
Member Author

For now I've pulled the pooling out, going to look at that separately.

@derekcollison derekcollison self-requested a review January 6, 2025 15:54
Copy link
Member

@derekcollison derekcollison left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@derekcollison derekcollison merged commit c953e99 into main Jan 6, 2025
5 checks passed
@derekcollison derekcollison deleted the neil/clientinfos branch January 6, 2025 15:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants