-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Brute force method to find the optimal number of harmonics for WaveX
, DMWaveX
, and CMWaveX
#1824
Open
abhisrkckl
wants to merge
26
commits into
nanograv:master
Choose a base branch
from
abhisrkckl:select-nharms
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from 54 commits
Commits
Show all changes
26 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2156329
noise_analysis
abhisrkckl c4fceda
test_noise_analysis
abhisrkckl 613d0e5
tests
abhisrkckl fdd12ce
joblib
abhisrkckl e14b82a
cmt
abhisrkckl 3f8c062
Merge branch 'nanograv:master' into select-nharms
abhisrkckl 3429bae
Merge branch 'cmwavex' into select-nharms
abhisrkckl 05af781
rn
abhisrkckl 5e5eedb
uncmt
abhisrkckl 97892a6
test_wx2pl
abhisrkckl 6428c47
CHANGELOG
abhisrkckl d96dcc1
test_optimal_nharms
abhisrkckl 5891c81
rednoise-fit-example.py
abhisrkckl a32bb40
CHANGELOG
abhisrkckl 8c45640
CHANGELOG
abhisrkckl 93728a1
msg
abhisrkckl 2723932
docstrings
abhisrkckl dc42b8b
fix test
abhisrkckl 8f43826
Merge branch 'nanograv:master' into select-nharms
abhisrkckl 5276f2d
Merge branch 'cmwavex' into select-nharms
abhisrkckl e4287c8
Merge branch 'nanograv:master' into select-nharms
abhisrkckl 3ee4cad
Merge branch 'nanograv:master' into select-nharms
abhisrkckl 7e79406
Merge branch 'master' into select-nharms
abhisrkckl e75dada
Merge branch 'nanograv:master' into select-nharms
abhisrkckl d3ca68e
Merge branch 'nanograv:master' into select-nharms
abhisrkckl 008be2d
Merge branch 'master' into select-nharms
abhisrkckl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ uncertainties | |
loguru | ||
nestle>=0.2.0 | ||
numdifftools | ||
joblib |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ install_requires = | |
loguru | ||
nestle>=0.2.0 | ||
numdifftools | ||
joblib | ||
|
||
[options.packages.find] | ||
where = src | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we discuss having a new requirement more broadly? If this is only needed for a subset of tasks, should it be optional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm personally fine with adding new requirements if the requirement is pure python and doesn't have a bunch of its own new requirements.
nestle
seems like it is of that (good) type.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this was actually adding
joblib
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In particular, I wonder about how using
joblib
compares to the use ofconcurrent.futures
? I see some discussion online. It seems like we might want to stick with one library for that functionality.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will try
concurrent.futures
.