Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade @nanlabs/eslint-config from 0.3.2 to 0.3.7 #9

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mdominguez56
Copy link
Contributor

@mdominguez56 mdominguez56 commented Aug 12, 2023

I used Snyk for code and container analysis, for devSecOps practices, and it generated this PR automatically. I already removed the Snyk sync with this repo, but I leave the PR in case we want to use it for analysis.

--

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade @nanlabs/eslint-config from 0.3.2 to 0.3.7.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 4 versions ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released 3 months ago, on 2023-05-16.
Release notes
Package name: @nanlabs/eslint-config
  • 0.3.7 - 2023-05-16
  • 0.3.6 - 2023-05-16
  • 0.3.5 - 2023-05-15
  • 0.3.4 - 2023-05-14
from @nanlabs/eslint-config GitHub release notes

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Messages
📖

📋 Missing Summary - Can you add a Summary? To do so, add a # What's this PR do? section to your PR description. This is a good place to explain the motivation for making this change.

📖 Thanks! We ❤️ small PRs!

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against c7854b1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants