Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bexley][WW] Only skip parent addresses if they are marked as 'shell' properties #5203

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

nephila-nacrea
Copy link
Contributor

We were skipping over all parent addresses on the assumption that all were 'shell' addresses that shouldn't be displayed. But the 'shell' status only applies to some parents.

For https://mysocietysupport.freshdesk.com/a/tickets/4432.
Closes https://github.com/mysociety/societyworks/issues/4498.

[skip changelog]

… properties

We were skipping over all parent addresses on the assumption that all were 'shell'
addresses that shouldn't be displayed. But the 'shell' status only applies to some
parents.
@nephila-nacrea nephila-nacrea self-assigned this Oct 3, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 3, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.22%. Comparing base (a3b842d) to head (7be5852).
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5203      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.41%   82.22%   -0.20%     
==========================================
  Files         407      409       +2     
  Lines       31789    32509     +720     
  Branches     5059     5101      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits        26199    26729     +530     
- Misses       4094     4272     +178     
- Partials     1496     1508      +12     
Flag Coverage Δ
?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

);
}
}

# It is possible for UPRNs in child_uprns to not occur in the postcodes table
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Turns out that the P/PP check fixes this issue as well, so have deleted this portion.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant