Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issues #810 Optimize TopicConfigAndMappingSerializeWrapper #815

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jul 22, 2024
Merged

Issues #810 Optimize TopicConfigAndMappingSerializeWrapper #815

merged 5 commits into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

847850277
Copy link
Contributor

@847850277 847850277 commented Jul 20, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #810

Brief Description

Optimize TopicConfigAndMappingSerializeWrapper

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new TopicConfigSerializeWrapper to enhance handling and organization of topic configuration data.
    • Updated topic configuration serialization to ensure mandatory inclusion of critical fields, improving data handling robustness.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined access and eliminated redundant code paths related to topic configuration, enhancing code clarity and performance.
  • Refactor

    • Refactored topic configuration handling across multiple components for improved readability and maintainability.
    • Simplified logic related to broker registration and topic management, reducing complexity in the implementation.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 20, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes across the RocketMQ codebase introduce a new TopicConfigSerializeWrapper to improve the handling of topic configurations. This restructuring encapsulates related fields such as topic_config_table and data_version, enhancing code clarity and maintainability. By eliminating optional fields, the implementation ensures that critical data is always present, simplifying interactions within the broker runtime and streamlining data management across multiple components.

Changes

Files Change Summary
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs Introduced TopicConfigSerializeWrapper for encapsulating topic configurations, enhancing serialization logic.
rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs Refactored to use TopicConfigSerializeWrapper, improving organization and data handling.
rocketmq-broker/src/topic/manager/topic_config_manager.rs, rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/topic_info_wrapper/topic_config_wrapper.rs Modified to encapsulate topic_config_table within TopicConfigSerializeWrapper, enforcing required fields.
rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs Streamlined access and handling of topic_config_serialize_wrapper, improving clarity and efficiency.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Broker as BrokerRuntimeInner
    participant Handler as TopicRequestHandler
    participant Manager as TopicConfigManager
    participant Namesrv as RouteInfoManager

    Broker->>Handler: Request Topic Configuration
    Handler->>Manager: Retrieve TopicConfigSerializeWrapper
    Manager->>Broker: Send Serialized Topic Config
    Broker->>Namesrv: Register/Update Topic Config
    Namesrv->>Broker: Confirm Registration
Loading

Poem

In fields of code, I hop and play,
With wrappers bright, we pave the way.
Encapsulated data, so neat and tight,
Makes our RocketMQ take flight!
Hooray for changes, clear and bright! 🌟🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mxsm
Copy link
Owner

mxsm commented Jul 20, 2024

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 30.23256% with 60 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.03%. Comparing base (ed2c4f2) to head (768a27b).

Files Patch % Lines
rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs 0.00% 44 Missing ⚠️
rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
...or/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
...q-broker/src/topic/manager/topic_config_manager.rs 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
...ol/body/topic_info_wrapper/topic_config_wrapper.rs 92.85% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #815      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   27.95%   28.03%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         296      296              
  Lines       23815    23832      +17     
==========================================
+ Hits         6657     6681      +24     
+ Misses      17158    17151       -7     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ed2c4f2 and 5267061.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs (3 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs (2 hunks)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/topic/manager/topic_config_manager.rs (1 hunks)
  • rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs (5 hunks)
  • rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/topic_info_wrapper/topic_config_wrapper.rs (6 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (14)
rocketmq-remoting/src/protocol/body/topic_info_wrapper/topic_config_wrapper.rs (5)

38-39: LGTM! The addition of TopicConfigSerializeWrapper improves encapsulation.

This change simplifies the structure by encapsulating related fields.


42-47: LGTM! The new TopicConfigSerializeWrapper struct enhances code clarity.

Encapsulating topic_config_table and data_version within this struct improves maintainability.


83-84: LGTM! The Default implementation is updated correctly.

The changes ensure proper initialization of topic_config_serialize_wrapper.


88-92: LGTM! The Default implementation is correct.

The changes ensure proper default initialization of topic_config_table and data_version.


Line range hint 108-151:
LGTM! The test cases are comprehensive.

The tests cover default initialization and getter methods, ensuring the correctness of the new structure.

rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs (2)

30-30: LGTM! The new import statement is necessary.

The import statement for TopicConfigSerializeWrapper is required for the changes in the file.


369-382: LGTM! The changes improve data organization.

Encapsulating topic_config_table and data_version within TopicConfigSerializeWrapper enhances the structure.

rocketmq-broker/src/topic/manager/topic_config_manager.rs (1)

237-240: LGTM! The changes improve data organization.

Encapsulating topic_config_table and data_version within TopicConfigSerializeWrapper enhances the structure.

rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs (3)

34-34: Import statement approved.

The import for TopicConfigSerializeWrapper is necessary for the changes introduced.


954-956: Assignment to topic_config_table is correct.

The assignment of topic_config_table to topic_config_serialize_wrapper is correct.

However, ensure that all function calls to register_broker_all correctly handle the new structure.

Verification successful

Assignment to topic_config_table is correct.

The assignment of topic_config_table to topic_config_serialize_wrapper is correct. All function calls to register_broker_all correctly handle the new structure involving TopicConfigAndMappingSerializeWrapper.

  • rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs
  • rocketmq-broker/src/out_api/broker_outer_api.rs
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `register_broker_all` handle the new structure.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of `TopicConfigSerializeWrapper`.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'register_broker_all'

Length of output: 4649


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Gather detailed context around calls to `register_broker_all` to verify correct handling of `TopicConfigSerializeWrapper`.

# Search for the function usage and include 10 lines of context before and after each match.
rg --type rust -C 10 $'register_broker_all'

Length of output: 15209


929-932: Initialization of TopicConfigSerializeWrapper looks good.

The initialization and assignment of data_version and topic_config_table are correct.

However, ensure that all function calls to register_increment_broker_data correctly handle the new structure.

Verification successful

Ensure correct handling of TopicConfigSerializeWrapper in register_increment_broker_data calls.

The function register_increment_broker_data is called in rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs at two locations. Verify that these calls properly handle the new structure of TopicConfigSerializeWrapper.


Initialization of TopicConfigSerializeWrapper looks good.

The initialization and assignment of data_version and topic_config_table are correct.

However, ensure that all function calls to register_increment_broker_data correctly handle the new structure.

  • The function calls in rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs correctly handle the new structure of TopicConfigSerializeWrapper.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `register_increment_broker_data` handle the new structure.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of `TopicConfigSerializeWrapper`.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'register_increment_broker_data'

Length of output: 1942


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Inspect the relevant lines in `topic_request_handler.rs` to ensure correct handling of `TopicConfigSerializeWrapper`.

# Extract lines around the first call to `register_increment_broker_data`
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 5 $'.register_increment_broker_data(' rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs

# Extract lines around the second call to `register_increment_broker_data`
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 5 $'.register_increment_broker_data(' rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs

Length of output: 511


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Inspect the relevant lines in `topic_request_handler.rs` to ensure correct handling of `TopicConfigSerializeWrapper`.

# Extract lines around the first call to `register_increment_broker_data`
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 5 $'\.register_increment_broker_data\(' rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs

# Extract lines around the second call to `register_increment_broker_data`
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 5 $'\.register_increment_broker_data\(' rocketmq-broker/src/processor/admin_broker_processor/topic_request_handler.rs

Length of output: 2279

rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs (3)

165-167: Direct access to topic_config_serialize_wrapper improves readability.

The changes eliminate unnecessary as_ref().unwrap() calls and improve readability.

However, ensure that all function calls to register_broker correctly handle the new access pattern.

Verification successful

Direct access to topic_config_serialize_wrapper improves readability.

The changes eliminate unnecessary as_ref().unwrap() calls and improve readability. All function calls to register_broker correctly handle the new access pattern.

  • rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs
  • rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs
  • rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs
  • rocketmq-broker/src/out_api/broker_outer_api.rs
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `register_broker` handle the new access pattern.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct handling of `topic_config_serialize_wrapper`.
rg --type rust -A 5 $'register_broker'

Length of output: 25285


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract more context around the `register_broker` calls to verify the correct handling of `topic_config_serialize_wrapper`.

# Extracting lines around `register_broker` call in `rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs`
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 10 'register_broker' rocketmq-namesrv/src/route/route_info_manager.rs

# Extracting lines around `register_broker` call in `rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs`
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 10 'register_broker' rocketmq-namesrv/src/processor/default_request_processor.rs

# Extracting lines around `register_broker` call in `rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs`
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 10 'register_broker' rocketmq-broker/src/broker_runtime.rs

# Extracting lines around `register_broker` call in `rocketmq-broker/src/out_api/broker_outer_api.rs`
rg --type rust -A 10 -B 10 'register_broker' rocketmq-broker/src/out_api/broker_outer_api.rs

Length of output: 25111


224-253: Consolidation of topic deletion logic is correct.

The changes consolidate the logic for topic deletion and updates, improving performance.

However, ensure that all function calls to the affected functions correctly handle the new logic.


277-288: Consistent pattern for checking and updating topic_queue_mapping_info_table is correct.

The changes ensure a consistent pattern for checking and updating the table, improving performance.

However, ensure that all function calls to the affected functions correctly handle the new pattern.

Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@847850277 please check code style

@mxsm
Copy link
Owner

mxsm commented Jul 22, 2024

🚀Thanks for your contribution🎉. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first🔥

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5267061 and 768a27b.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/topic/manager/topic_config_manager.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • rocketmq-broker/src/topic/manager/topic_config_manager.rs

Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Optimize TopicConfigAndMappingSerializeWrapper
2 participants