[ISSUE #549]🔧Update automerge.yml #550
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@mxsm has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 16 minutes and 41 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)Not applicable as the changes are primarily configuration and adjustments, without modifying control flow or adding features. Possibly related issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review Please review this PR. |
|
🚀This PR has been automatically merged with squash.🚀 |
|
@mxsm, I've reviewed the changes to the
Overall, the configuration looks solid and aligns with best practices for GitHub Actions related to automerging. If you have any specific areas within this setup you'd like me to look deeper into, or if there's additional functionality you're considering adding, feel free to let me know! Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Fetch the contents of automerge.yml from the PR branch
cat .github/workflows/automerge.yml
Length of output: 1105 Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@coderabbitai review Please review this PR. |
|
@mxsm, thank you for requesting another review of your PR. I've previously analyzed the updates made to the
The configuration appears solid and aligns with best practices for GitHub Actions related to automerging. If there are any specific areas you'd like to delve deeper into, or additional functionalities you're considering, please let me know! Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/automerge.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
.github/workflows/automerge.yml (4)
19-19: Using the pull request title as the merge commit message enhances traceability and understandability of commit history.
21-21: Increasing the merge retries may help in high-traffic scenarios but monitor for any potential delays in CI processes.
22-22: Increasing the retry sleep duration is prudent to reduce server load, but keep an eye on the impact it may have on overall merge times.
23-23: Requiring at least one approval before merging is a good practice to ensure code quality.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #550 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 25.44% 25.44%
=======================================
Files 233 233
Lines 17029 17029
=======================================
Hits 4333 4333
Misses 12696 12696 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #549
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit