[ISSUE #547]🔧Update automerge.yml #548
Conversation
WalkthroughThe update to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
|
@coderabbitai review Please review this PR. |
|
@mxsm, I have reviewed the PR #548 concerning the update to
Evaluation:
These changes appear appropriate for the objective of updating the automerge behavior. If there are any specific aspects of the PR you would like further insights on, please let me know! Analysis chainScripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Fetch details about the PR, including the files changed and the target branch
gh pr view 548 --repo mxsm/rocketmq-rust --json files,baseRefName
# Fetch the content of the changes made to the automerge.yml file
gh pr diff 548 --repo mxsm/rocketmq-rust
Length of output: 834 Actions performedReview triggered.
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/automerge.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/automerge.yml (1)
17-17: The update toMERGE_LABELSrequires both "approved" and "auto merge" labels for automatic merging. Ensure that this aligns with your team's workflow and that all stakeholders are aware of this new requirement.Verification successful
The update to
MERGE_LABELSto require both "approved" and "auto merge" labels for automatic merging appears to be safe, as no PRs were found with only the "auto merge" label. Please ensure that this aligns with your team's workflow and that all stakeholders are aware of this new requirement.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for PRs that might be affected by the new label requirement. # Test: Search for PRs that are labeled only with "auto merge". Expect: No such PRs should exist. gh pr list --label "auto merge" --search "-label:approved"Length of output: 58
| @@ -14,8 +14,7 @@ jobs: | |||
| uses: "pascalgn/[email protected]" | |||
| env: | |||
| GITHUB_TOKEN: "${{ secrets.PAT_TOKEN }}" | |||
| MERGE_LABELS: "auto merge" | |||
| MERGE_REMOVE_LABELS: "auto merge" | |||
| MERGE_LABELS: "approved,auto merge" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The removal of MERGE_REMOVE_LABELS configuration is not directly visible in the changes. If removed, consider adding a cleanup step to remove labels post-merge to keep the PR space clean.
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #548 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 25.45% 25.44% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 233 233
Lines 17029 17029
==========================================
- Hits 4334 4333 -1
- Misses 12695 12696 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)
Fixes #547
Brief Description
How Did You Test This Change?
Summary by CodeRabbit