Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE #1202]🔨Upate Github actions CI🔧 #1203

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mxsm
Copy link
Owner

@mxsm mxsm commented Nov 17, 2024

Which Issue(s) This PR Fixes(Closes)

Fixes #1202

Brief Description

How Did You Test This Change?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved pull request comments for better clarity and engagement.
    • Updated labeling scheme for pull requests to enhance organization.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Restructured comment body to prioritize the pull request creator's mention.

@rocketmq-rust-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🚀Thanks for your contribution 🎉 @mxsm. CodeRabbit(AI) will review your code first 🔥

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the workflow file .github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml, updating the comment body format and the labels applied to pull requests. The comment now places the pull request creator's username at the beginning, and the labels have been changed to reflect a rephrased description for the AI review process.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/auto-comment-pr.yml Updated comment body to reorder the creator's username and modified labels for pull requests.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Update GitHub actions CI (#1202)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • TeslaRustor
  • SpaceXCN

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where the code does play,
A new comment springs forth, brightening the day.
With labels adjusted and greetings anew,
The workflow dances, all thanks to you! 🌼✨

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@rocketmq-rust-bot has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 29 minutes and 12 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1ea411f and d9a0c97.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 17, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 16.82%. Comparing base (1ea411f) to head (d9a0c97).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1203   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   16.82%   16.82%           
=======================================
  Files         427      427           
  Lines       52835    52835           
=======================================
  Hits         8888     8888           
  Misses      43947    43947           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rocketmq-rust-bot rocketmq-rust-bot merged commit 510f679 into main Nov 17, 2024
22 of 23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Enhancement⚡️] Upate Github actions CI
3 participants