Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support linemod params analysis #24

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

RunqiuBao
Copy link

support linemod params analysis

@@ -1605,7 +1606,7 @@ pcl::LINEMOD::detectTemplatesSemiScaleInvariant (
}

detection.template_id = static_cast<int> (template_index);
detection.score = score;
detection.score = raw_score_rebased;//score;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we keep the score the same, and add raw_score_rebased member to detection. (why not also adding raw_score as well?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@florisatmujin sure. But I was confused by these different scores and feel some redundancy. I wonder (through test) if it is possible to only use one kind of score.

Comment on lines +1752 to +1756
#pragma omp critical
{
scoresTemp.push_back(raw_score_rebased);
indicesOfDetections.push_back(detection_index);
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why don't we store the score inside the LINEMODDetection member?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@florisatmujin evaluationScores is evaluation score, it has nothing to do with the detection

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants