Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

legacy: fixes after lando-api merge (bug 1944562) #227

Closed

Conversation

zzzeid
Copy link
Collaborator

@zzzeid zzzeid commented Feb 19, 2025

This PR includes all the changes in the api-merge.

@zzzeid zzzeid changed the title legacy: fixes after lando-api merge legacy: fixes after lando-api merge (bug 1944562) Feb 19, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@zzzeid zzzeid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there are changes in main that the original merge undid (looks like the files affected are ones that had a conflict). The changes are re-added in this PR, which I assume is related to the changes that you merged after the initial merge and conflict fixes.

This is not ideal, though I think if we can review the diff between main and this branch for those files specifically and make sure nothing else was lost, we can merge this. I marked those files that I think are affected by this with a comment.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes here look like they were undone in #226 and are re-added here.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I fixed this by reverting the state of this file to origin/main in the merge-only PR, correct?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes I think this and other similar ones were due to the outdated files in the merge PR but not in the fixup PR.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These changes appear to be also re-added from a previous commit.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@zzzeid zzzeid Feb 19, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this part of this PR?

Edit: to clarify this comment, it looks like this was moved from somewhere else? The source possibly got lost in the original merge, but thought I would flag this along with scm.hg below.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it was moved from the conftest.py in LandoAPI but it better suited for the global conftest.py than the API-only one.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this part of this PR?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's part of the port? We added several new snippets to retry jobs on error messages from hgmo.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bunch of changes here appear to be re-added after the original merge.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be fixed by reverting the state of this file in the merge-only PR to origin/main, correct?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: empty files could be deleted.

@zzzeid
Copy link
Collaborator Author

zzzeid commented Feb 27, 2025

Closed as this was for illustration purposes.

@zzzeid zzzeid closed this Feb 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants