Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Framework Cleanup #108

Closed
wants to merge 316 commits into from
Closed

Framework Cleanup #108

wants to merge 316 commits into from

Conversation

andygolay
Copy link

Description

Type of Change

  • New feature
  • [x ] Bug fix
  • Breaking change
  • Performance improvement
  • Refactoring
  • Dependency update
  • [ x] Documentation update
  • Tests

Which Components or Systems Does This Change Impact?

  • Validator Node
  • Full Node (API, Indexer, etc.)
  • Move/Aptos Virtual Machine
  • Aptos Framework
  • Aptos CLI/SDK
  • Developer Infrastructure
  • Other (specify)

How Has This Been Tested?

Move unit tests and

Key Areas to Review

Checklist

  • I have read and followed the CONTRIBUTING doc
  • [x ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • [ x] I identified and added all stakeholders and component owners affected by this change as reviewers
  • I tested both happy and unhappy path of the functionality
  • [ x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation

l-monninger and others added 30 commits April 25, 2024 16:25
Eliminate the async dependency in consensus-types.
Stub out the status field in ProofWithData with the vector that's
evenutally supposed to be retrieved, until we figure out if we need
the field and the whole structure at all.
aptos-consensus had code that provided consensus-types data
in asynchronous sends. Since we are not likely to need this crate
anyway, cut it out of the workspace. Also remove any dependent crates.
It's only used in test code, move it to dev-dependencies
ENG-251 aptos-logger: cut out async logging
ENG-180: Cut out async dependencies from consensus-types and async-vm
…-block-reversion

ENG-206 Implement Block Reversion
Some tests still had these.
AptosDB::commit_reversion_ledger_info
does the same thing as commit_ledger_info,
just use that method instead.
This wrapper is meant to represent the finalized state
for the API.
No randomness allows us to verify the hash.
get_read_delegatee needs to deref to get the vtable
for the pointee type.
FinalityView::set_finalized_block_height better describes
the argument.
andygolay and others added 29 commits November 20, 2024 08:43
Framework Move modules and spec for Trusted Relayer Native Bridge
…th side. Move unit tests pass, still working on E2E Move tests
…for now to help reviewers make sense of everything
Native bridge: Modify param serialization to make bridge transfer IDs match on Move and Solidity sides in both L1 -> L2 and L2 -> L1 directions
@andygolay andygolay closed this Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants