Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ focus scanning on customer workloads #1153

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 30, 2024
Merged

✨ focus scanning on customer workloads #1153

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 30, 2024

Conversation

slntopp
Copy link
Member

@slntopp slntopp commented Jul 30, 2024

No description provided.

@slntopp slntopp requested a review from imilchev July 30, 2024 14:00
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jul 30, 2024

Test Results

  5 files   -   1   51 suites  +45   2h 17m 8s ⏱️ - 2h 33m 19s
319 tests +296  319 ✅ +296  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
388 runs  +250  388 ✅ +250  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 320bfdd. ± Comparison against base commit e28adf9.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@slntopp slntopp requested a review from imilchev July 30, 2024 14:38
@imilchev
Copy link
Member

You will need to update the integration tests since they verify the workloads that end up in the mondoo platform. Since this now changed, the tests need to be updated to expect the correct workloads

@slntopp
Copy link
Member Author

slntopp commented Jul 30, 2024

@imilchev yep, working on it rn

Copy link
Member

@imilchev imilchev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@slntopp slntopp merged commit 0f5e02e into main Jul 30, 2024
20 of 21 checks passed
@slntopp slntopp deleted the mik/focus-scanning branch July 30, 2024 16:07
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 30, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants