Skip to content

fix(evt): optional field mishandling #2490

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 23, 2025

Conversation

mjreno
Copy link
Contributor

@mjreno mjreno commented Apr 17, 2025

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.1%. Comparing base (e2af433) to head (674f343).
Report is 11 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           develop   #2490   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage     76.0%   76.1%           
=======================================
  Files          296     296           
  Lines        64158   64205   +47     
=======================================
+ Hits         48803   48865   +62     
+ Misses       15355   15340   -15     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
flopy/mf6/data/mfdatastorage.py 75.4% <100.0%> (-0.1%) ⬇️
flopy/mf6/data/mfdatautil.py 77.9% <ø> (ø)
flopy/mf6/data/mffileaccess.py 76.6% <100.0%> (+0.7%) ⬆️

... and 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mjreno mjreno changed the title fix(evt): evt optional field mishandling fix(evt): optional field mishandling Apr 17, 2025
@mjreno mjreno marked this pull request as ready for review April 22, 2025 16:56
@wpbonelli wpbonelli merged commit dcba9cf into modflowpy:develop Apr 23, 2025
20 checks passed
mjreno added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants