This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 22, 2022. It is now read-only.
Docs3 #105
Closed
Docs3 #105
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @bcottman, Regarding Pull Requests with documentation. At this point we have three PRs with documentation, that is #95 #102 and #105 (this one). Should I merge them in sequence: 95->102->105, or just take the latest one and resolve conflicts in favor of the latest PR? Thanks for your reply, Best, |
|
Yes. Merge in order. Sorry. Somewhat confusing. I had to look it over. I will Be more descriptive in future. Let me know problems/issues/comments and I should be able to respond in 48 hours
Regards Bruce
… On Oct 4, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Kamil A. Kaczmarek ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi @bcottman,
Regarding Pull Requests with documentation. At this point we have three PRs with documentation, that is #95 #102 and #105 (this one).
Should I merge them in sequence: 95->102->105, or just take the latest one and resolve conflicts in favor of the latest PR?
Thanks for your reply,
Best,
Kamil Kaczmarek
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
|
Steppy is correct.
Merde! closed #39 Steppy-toolkit which should not be closed. I can probably get away with touching all related files and issue pull doc.test.3 and close doc.test.2. I apologize . I should be able todo tonight. So long as you don’t look early than until 6am tomorrow. Should be able to merge
Sorry again about that
- Bruce
… On Oct 4, 2018, at 12:51 PM, ***@***.***" ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes. Merge in order. Sorry. Somewhat confusing. I had to look it over. I will Be more descriptive in future. Let me know problems/issues/comments and I should be able to respond in 48 hours
Regards Bruce
> On Oct 4, 2018, at 11:22 AM, Kamil A. Kaczmarek ***@***.***> wrote:
>
> Hi @bcottman,
>
> Regarding Pull Requests with documentation. At this point we have three PRs with documentation, that is #95 #102 and #105 (this one).
>
> Should I merge them in sequence: 95->102->105, or just take the latest one and resolve conflicts in favor of the latest PR?
>
> Thanks for your reply,
>
> Best,
> Kamil Kaczmarek
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
|
use pull doc.test.3 for steppy-tool-kit. |
|
just seeing conflicts now. will resolve |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull Request template
Doc contributions
Contributing.html
FAQ.html
intro.html
testdoc.html
tested by running in docs/
Regards Bruce
core contributors to the minerva.ml