Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can metapop increase its mapping criteria to solve strain-level community marcro-/micro-diversity? #12

Open
ChaoLab opened this issue Mar 10, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@ChaoLab
Copy link

ChaoLab commented Mar 10, 2022

It was stated that metapop is not optimized to study "strain-level genotypes". While since the calculation methods for metrics of macro-/micro-diversity are the same for both species-level and strain-level populations, is it possible to tune the settings to achieve this? For example, for species-level population mapping, a 95% ANI boundary is expected, the minimal identity of reads to reference can be set to 92% (lower with 3% percentage due to genome heterogeneity). For strain-level population mapping, a 98-99% ANI boundary is expected (or a higher setting as one may choose), the minimal identity of reads to reference can be set to 95 or 96%. This seems to be what inStrain sets (https://instrain.readthedocs.io/en/master/important_concepts.html#handling-and-reducing-mis-mapping-reads).

@metaGmetapop
Copy link
Owner

Hi ChaoLab - yes you can adjust the parameters to change the %ID ANI boundaries by adjusting the --id_min.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants