Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

use erikdw/storm's patched version of storm 0.9.6 to build storm-mesos package #151

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 21, 2016

Conversation

erikdw
Copy link
Collaborator

@erikdw erikdw commented Jun 21, 2016

Per the release notes in erikdw/storm there are
a few tweaks that have been made to storm to make it more friendly for running storm-mesos:

  1. Per-topology worker logs
  2. Shorten java classpaths in various commands to ensure ps output includes full command
  3. Flush bin/storm output output before exec'ing java process

…s package

Per the [release notes in erikdw/storm](https://github.com/erikdw/storm/releases) there are
a few tweaks that have been made to storm to make it more friendly for running storm-mesos:

1. Per-topology worker logs
2. Shorten java classpaths in various commands to ensure ps output includes full command
3. Flush bin/storm output output before exec'ing java process
@erikdw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

erikdw commented Jun 21, 2016

@JessicaLHartog : please 👀 when you have a chance. This has been tested in erikdw/storm-mesos, which is why I had to fix #149 & #150 first, in order to actually test this. :)

@erikdw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

erikdw commented Jun 21, 2016

Once this is reviewed, I will release the next version of this project. Then when #146 lands we will cut another version. That should then free us to do the branch split that will allow support for storm 1.0 to proceed.

@JessicaLHartog
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM, but out of sheer curiosity, why is the file name apache-storm-0.9.6-storm-mesos2.tar.gz and not simply apache-storm-0.9.6-storm-mesos.tar.gz?

@erikdw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

erikdw commented Jun 21, 2016

'cause it's the 2nd release. :) We'll do more if we need to iterate more.

This comes from:

@JessicaLHartog
Copy link
Collaborator

Makes sense, thanks for clarifying. :shipit:

@erikdw erikdw merged commit 682f55c into mesos:master Jun 21, 2016
@erikdw erikdw deleted the use-erikdw-storm-patched-0.9.6 branch June 21, 2016 22:56
@erikdw erikdw added the build label Jun 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants