-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support larger values for SDP attributes #3282
Merged
Merged
Changes from 7 commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2c339c1
Batch configure for streaming plugin
petarminchev 58679f9
Merge branch 'meetecho:master' into master
petarminchev d5f6fc4
1. Added documentation of streams array
petarminchev 44ca0fd
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/meetecho/janus-gateway
petarminchev 15b7868
Increase buffer size of SDP attribute value to support around 267 mid…
petarminchev bffec3d
Increase buffer size on chained mids.
petarminchev bb7f03b
Fix one more occurrence of small [512] buffer when writing SDP
petarminchev de9c79a
Increased initial SDP allocation size to 4096
petarminchev 7c3edc4
Reduced initial SDP allocation size to 2560, since 4096 was unnecessa…
petarminchev File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the buffer is this large, now, then I guess the
sdp
allocation we start from should be larger too? We only reallocate it when appending m-lines, which means it should be large enough to handle global attributes before that.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You are right, should then the sdplen variable match the g_malloc(size)?
So I should change to *char sdp = g_malloc(4096) and size_t sdplen = 4096?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@lminiero - Committed an increase to 4096 of initial g_malloc and size_t sdplen
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mh I think it might be overkill, the vast majority of SDPs are never that large: I think we started from a lower value on purpose. I'll give this some thought and get back to you later on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To be more conservative, maybe let's keep the same diff that was before, so 2048+512=2560? It's still large, but not THAT large.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, reduced to 2560 sdplen and g_malloc(size)