Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduced a basic no_std implementation heavily relying on alloc #179

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

umgefahren
Copy link

I made this prototype implementation of no_std.

@umgefahren umgefahren changed the title Introduced a basic no_std implementation heavily relying on alloc Introduced a basic no_std implementation heavily relying on alloc Feb 3, 2024
@umgefahren umgefahren changed the title Introduced a basic no_std implementation heavily relying on alloc Introduced a basic no_std implementation heavily relying on alloc Feb 3, 2024
@mcginty
Copy link
Owner

mcginty commented Feb 19, 2025

Sorry for not following up on this, other life situations led to me having this crate in basically maintenance mode the last year. closing due to this feature now being in main. Thanks!

@mcginty mcginty closed this Feb 19, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants