Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add a kustomize base to the repository #144

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2024

Conversation

james-callahan
Copy link
Contributor

Adds a kustomize application that stands up a running instance of go-httpbin in a Kubernetes cluster.

This is useful to reference as a remote kustomization via your own kustomization, or can be used as:
kustomize build github.com/mccutchen/go-httpbin/kustomize | kubectl apply -f -
or even as: kubectl apply -k github.com/mccutchen/go-httpbin/kustomize

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 22, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #144 (60dfafd) into main (dd8fc10) will decrease coverage by 1.75%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #144      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.11%   93.37%   -1.75%     
==========================================
  Files           9       12       +3     
  Lines        2171     2280     +109     
==========================================
+ Hits         2065     2129      +64     
- Misses         72      105      +33     
- Partials       34       46      +12     

see 3 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Owner

@mccutchen mccutchen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh this is a cool idea, thanks! Would you mind adding a brief note to the main README (maybe after the Docker section) pointing to this?

kustomize/README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@mccutchen
Copy link
Owner

Gonna close this for now. @james-callahan please feel free to reopen when you have the bandwidth to finish it!

@mccutchen mccutchen closed this Nov 4, 2023
@james-callahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mccutchen I can't reopen myself.

Aside from the minor typo above, isn't this mergable event without a note in the main readme?

@mccutchen mccutchen reopened this Feb 9, 2024
@mccutchen
Copy link
Owner

Yes, it's mergeable as-is, but I'd prefer to merge it with a reference in the README. If you're not interested in adding that yourself, let me know and I can take care of it.

Also, to get CI checks to pass, I think this will also require merging in or rebasing on main.

@james-callahan
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mccutchen I have rebased and added the requested note in the main readme.

Copy link
Owner

@mccutchen mccutchen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the contribution!

@mccutchen mccutchen merged commit 06f6727 into mccutchen:main Feb 12, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants