Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reference-implementations/object-storage #19

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

csadorf
Copy link
Collaborator

@csadorf csadorf commented Jun 16, 2022

Reference implementation for the object storage server API.

@csadorf csadorf force-pushed the reference-implementations/object-storage branch 2 times, most recently from 3bf4311 to 769b301 Compare June 17, 2022 11:00
Base automatically changed from implement-datasink-and-datasource-api-as-object-storage-api to main June 17, 2022 11:03
@csadorf csadorf force-pushed the reference-implementations/object-storage branch from 769b301 to 086d9d1 Compare June 17, 2022 11:03
@csadorf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

csadorf commented Jun 17, 2022

This is still work-in-progress however it provides an indication whether the API is practical and usable and allowed me to implement a first set of tests. Unless you object, I would shift attention to the Python SDK now, but I would appreciate if you could review this in the meantime. I would use this draft implementation as basis for executing actual tests for the SDK.

@csadorf csadorf linked an issue Jun 21, 2022 that may be closed by this pull request
@csadorf csadorf force-pushed the reference-implementations/object-storage branch from bd122e1 to 93d1599 Compare June 22, 2022 13:52
@csadorf csadorf changed the base branch from main to improve-modularity June 22, 2022 13:52
@csadorf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

csadorf commented Jun 22, 2022

Should be merged after #23 .

@csadorf csadorf force-pushed the reference-implementations/object-storage branch from 93d1599 to 972ffa4 Compare June 23, 2022 09:40
Base automatically changed from improve-modularity to main June 24, 2022 15:07
@csadorf csadorf force-pushed the reference-implementations/object-storage branch from 972ffa4 to 9ecc9de Compare June 24, 2022 15:23
@csadorf
Copy link
Collaborator Author

csadorf commented Jul 26, 2022

We should evaluate whether it would be easier to just use minio to provide the object storage reference implementation.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add reference implementation for objectStorage capabilities
1 participant