Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solution #1241

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Solution #1241

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

pdabizha
Copy link

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


Thank you for your hard work on this project! 🌟 While your code generally meets the task requirements, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed before we can approve the pull request:

  1. Error Handling: There are several areas where error handling is either missing or too generic. It's important to provide specific error messages to help users understand what went wrong, especially during operations like loading users, posts, and comments, as well as during comment creation and deletion.

  2. Typographical Errors: There are typos in function and state variable names, such as setShouldFormBeVisile and handleCommentDeliete. These should be corrected to maintain code clarity and prevent potential issues.

  3. Email Validation: The current email validation only checks for an empty field. Implement a more robust validation to ensure the input is a valid email format.

  4. State Management: After a successful comment submission, ensure that all form fields are reset to provide a clean slate for the user.

  5. Code Simplification: Simplify conditions like posts && posts?.length > 0 to posts?.length > 0 for cleaner code.

Addressing these issues will enhance the functionality and maintainability of your code. Keep up the great work, and I'm confident you'll nail these improvements! 😊

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.

const handleUserSelect = (user: User | null) => {
setSelectedUser(user);
setSelectedPost(null);
fetchPosts(user?.id || null);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The use of optional chaining (user?.id || null) is correct here to handle cases where user might be null. However, ensure that fetchPosts is designed to handle a null argument appropriately, as this could potentially lead to unexpected behavior if not handled correctly.

</div>
)}

{posts && posts?.length > 0 && (

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The check posts && posts?.length > 0 is slightly redundant because posts?.length > 0 will already ensure that posts is not null or undefined. You can simplify this condition to posts?.length > 0.

Comment on lines +10 to +11
export const getPosts = (id: number) => {
return client.get<Post[]>(`/posts?userId=${id}`);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure that the id parameter passed to getPosts is validated before making the request. If id is not a valid number, it could lead to unexpected API behavior or errors.

Comment on lines +14 to +15
export const getComments = (postId: number) => {
return client.get<Comment[]>(`/comments?postId=${postId}`);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar to getPosts, ensure that postId is validated before making the request to avoid potential issues with invalid IDs.

Comment on lines +18 to +19
export const deleteComment = (commentId: number) => {
return client.delete(`/comments/${commentId}`);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding error handling for the deleteComment function to manage cases where the comment might not exist or the deletion fails.

Comment on lines +73 to +80
{usersFromServer.map(user => (
<UserItem
key={user.id}
user={user}
onSelect={handleUserSelect}
isActive={user.id === activeUser?.id}
/>
))}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding a loading state or a message to indicate when users are being fetched from the server, especially if the fetching process takes noticeable time.

.then(response => response.json());
.then(response => {
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error();

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error thrown here is generic. Consider providing a more descriptive error message or including the response status and status text to aid in debugging.

postService
.getUsers()
.then(data => setUsers(data))
.catch(() => onError('Something went wrong!'));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider providing more specific error messages in the catch block to help users understand what went wrong during the user loading process.

postService
.getPosts(userId)
.then(setPosts)
.catch(() => onError('Something went wrong!'))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar to the user loading, consider providing more specific error messages for post loading failures to aid in debugging and user feedback.

const createdComment = await postService.postComment(newComment);

setComment(createdComment);
} catch {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Providing more specific error messages for comment creation failures can help users understand the issue better and improve the debugging process.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


Great job on your submission! 🎉 While there are some areas for improvement, the overall structure and functionality of your code are solid. Here are a few key points to focus on:

  • Error Handling: Many components and hooks have generic error messages like "Something went wrong!" Consider providing more specific error messages to help users understand what went wrong and improve debugging.
  • Email Validation: Enhance the email validation in the NewCommentForm component to ensure a valid email format is used.
  • State Management: After a successful comment submission, ensure all form fields are reset to provide a clean slate for the user.
  • Code Simplification: Simplify conditions like posts && posts?.length > 0 to posts?.length > 0 for cleaner code.
  • API Error Handling: Add error handling for API functions to manage potential errors during HTTP requests effectively.

These improvements will enhance the user experience and code maintainability. Keep up the great work, and use this feedback to refine your skills further! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

</div>
)}

{posts && posts?.length > 0 && (

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The condition posts && posts?.length > 0 can be simplified to posts?.length > 0. This makes the code cleaner and easier to read.

Comment on lines +6 to +24
export const getUsers = () => {
return client.get<User[]>('/users');
};

export const getPosts = (id: number) => {
return client.get<Post[]>(`/posts?userId=${id}`);
};

export const getComments = (postId: number) => {
return client.get<Comment[]>(`/comments?postId=${postId}`);
};

export const deleteComment = (commentId: number) => {
return client.delete(`/comments/${commentId}`);
};

export const postComment = (comment: Omit<Comment, 'id'>) => {
return client.post<Comment>('/comments', comment);
};

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding error handling for these API functions. This can be done by using try-catch blocks or handling promise rejections to ensure that any errors during the HTTP requests are managed appropriately.

try {
await handleDelete(comment.id);
onDelete(comment.id);
} catch (error) {}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The catch block is currently empty. Consider handling the error by providing feedback to the user or logging the error. This will help in debugging and improve user experience by informing them of any issues during the deletion process.

const handleSubmit = (event: React.FormEvent) => {
event.preventDefault();
setHasTitleError(!titleVal);
setHasEmailError(!emailVal);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The current email validation only checks if the email field is empty. Consider implementing a more robust validation to ensure the input is a valid email format. This will help prevent invalid email addresses from being submitted.

useEffect(() => {
if (comment) {
onSubmit(comment);
setCommentVal('');

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

After a successful comment submission, ensure that all form fields are reset to provide a clean slate for the user. Currently, only the comment field is being reset.

.then(data => {
setComments(data);
})
.catch(() => setErrorMessage('Something went wrong!'))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error message 'Something went wrong!' is quite generic. Consider providing a more specific error message to help users understand what went wrong during the comment loading process.

activeUser,
}) => {
const [isDropdownOpen, setIsDropdownOpen] = useState(false);
const usersFromServer = useLoadUsers(onError);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure that the error handling for loading users is robust. Consider displaying an error message to the user if the useLoadUsers hook encounters an error, to provide clear feedback and improve the user experience.

.then(response => response.json());
.then(response => {
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error();

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error handling here is quite generic. Consider throwing an error with more detailed information, such as the response status or message, to aid in debugging and provide clearer feedback.

postService
.getUsers()
.then(data => setUsers(data))
.catch(() => onError('Something went wrong!'));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error message 'Something went wrong!' is quite generic. Consider providing a more specific error message to help users understand what went wrong during the user loading process.

postService
.getPosts(userId)
.then(setPosts)
.catch(() => onError('Something went wrong!'))

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The error message 'Something went wrong!' is quite generic. Consider providing a more specific error message to help users understand what went wrong during the post loading process.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants