add solution #130
add solution #130
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on implementing the HTTP server! 🎉 The code is well-structured and meets the task requirements. While there are a few minor issues, such as the need for better validation of the 'compressionType' and 'file' fields, and the use of a 405 status code for GET requests on the 'compress' route, these do not significantly impact the functionality. Keep up the good work and consider these improvements for future projects! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| res.writeHead(400, { 'content-type': 'text/plain' }); | ||
| res.end('Request should be POST method!'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When the request method is GET for the 'compress' route, it would be more appropriate to return a 405 Method Not Allowed status code instead of 400 Bad Request. This status code better indicates that the method is not allowed for the requested resource.
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| form.parse(req, (err, { compressionType }, { file }) => { | ||
| if (err || !file || !compressionType) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The 'compressionType' and 'file' fields are assumed to be arrays. Ensure that these fields are validated properly to avoid potential runtime errors. Consider checking if 'compressionType' and 'file' are arrays and have at least one element before accessing them.
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (!compressors.hasOwnProperty(compressionType[0])) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The 'compressionType' field is assumed to be an array. Ensure that it is validated properly before accessing its first element. Consider adding a check to confirm that 'compressionType' is an array and has at least one element.
No description provided.