Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed failed test, due to error message not matching. #6106

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

omar908
Copy link

@omar908 omar908 commented Aug 3, 2023

Fixed failed test, due to error message not matching.

assert.fail('Expected error not thrown!');
} catch(error) {
assert.equal(error.message, 'Invalid URL: foobar');
assert.equal(error.message + ':' + invalidURL, 'Invalid URL:'+ invalidURL);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This assertion does not look correct to me.
The error message seems to not contain the URL anymore.
The old assertion looks correct to me, so the production code probably needs to be fixed and not the test.

Copy link
Author

@omar908 omar908 Aug 7, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @ronny1982!

The error is coming from node.js internals, not the repo of the application.
image

I just finished double checking on this to be safe.
Changes were made on the Node.js internals to remove the invalidURL from the error message, please see below of the change that was made:
nodejs/node@417c31b

Thank you for the feedback!

Copy link
Contributor

@ronny1982 ronny1982 Aug 8, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So this means the test output depends on the NodeJS version on which the test is performed?

In this case, the test should be adjusted to work with any NodeJS version and not just with the latest, or the test should be kept as is and the node version for this project needs to be locked to the same version that is shipped with the HakuNeko Desktop Client (Electron 8.3.4 => NodeJS 12.13.0).

May also affect the build pipeline

Copy link
Contributor

@ronny1982 ronny1982 Aug 8, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

OK, it seems the build agents are installing NodeJS 16.x instead of the required 10.x which explains why the test is breaking now on the pipeline.

image

I suggest to leave the test unchanged, but properly adjust the build pipeline to use NodeJS 12

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct, they were 12.x previously. Those changes within the github actions workflow were made here, I THINK:
73826d5

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I can adjust the test to work with either version, but first we need to decide, do we want to go back to 12.x on the github workflow as well, in that case I would double check to see if the issue even exists once we go back.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, I didn't see the bottom of you message, my mistake.
Let me make a separate PR to change the build pipeline and double check the test then.

Copy link
Contributor

@ronny1982 ronny1982 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Submit feedback that must be addressed before merging.

@omar908 omar908 requested a review from ronny1982 August 8, 2023 19:30
@omar908 omar908 closed this Aug 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants