chore: delete deprecated tables #5833
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce two new fields, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant Paginator
User->>API: Request data with pagination
API->>Paginator: Validate request parameters
Paginator->>Paginator: Check offset and limit
Paginator-->>API: Return paginated results
API-->>User: Send paginated response
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
apiserver/plane/db/models/project.py (2)
Line range hint
328-328: Consider removing the extra leading space.The added space before
ordering = ("-created_at",)in theProjectIdentifierclass'sMetais inconsistent with typical Python indentation practices. While it doesn't affect functionality, removing this space would maintain consistency with the rest of the codebase.- ordering = ("-created_at",) + ordering = ("-created_at",)
ProjectFavorite Removal Incomplete
References to
ProjectFavoritestill exist in the following areas:
- Migrations:
0022_auto_20230307_0304.py,0081_alter_issueviewfavorite_unique_together_and_more.py,0065_auto_20240415_0937.py- Views:
ProjectFavoritesViewSet- Serializers:
ProjectFavoriteLiteSerializer- URLs:
ProjectFavoritesViewSetendpoints- Database Tables:
project_favoritesrelated namesPlease ensure all dependencies are resolved before removing the
ProjectFavoriteclass.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-328: Verify the impact of removing theProjectFavoriteclass.The removal of the deprecated
ProjectFavoriteclass improves code maintainability. However, it's important to ensure that this removal doesn't negatively impact other parts of the codebase.Please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the
ProjectFavoriteclass:
Please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the
ProjectFavoriteclass:🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the ProjectFavorite class # Test: Search for ProjectFavorite references echo "Searching for ProjectFavorite references:" rg --type python "ProjectFavorite" # Test: Search for project_favorite references (assuming this was a related_name) echo "Searching for project_favorite references:" rg --type python "project_favorite"Length of output: 320
Script:
# #!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining references to the ProjectFavorite class # Test: Search for ProjectFavorite references in Python files echo "Searching for ProjectFavorite references in Python files:" rg -g "*.py" "ProjectFavorite" # Test: Search for project_favorite references in Python files echo "Searching for project_favorite references in Python files:" rg -g "*.py" "project_favorite"Length of output: 1815
apiserver/plane/db/migrations/0081_alter_issueviewfavorite_unique_together_and_more.py (2)
12-15: Redundant removal of unique constraints before deleting modelsSince the models
IssueViewFavorite,ModuleFavorite,PageFavorite, andProjectFavoriteare being deleted later in this migration, removing their unique constraints withAlterUniqueTogetheris unnecessary. Deleting the models will automatically remove any associated constraints.Consider simplifying the migration by removing these
AlterUniqueTogetheroperations.Also applies to: 40-43, 68-71, 96-99
16-39: Unnecessary field removals before model deletionsThe fields are being removed from models that are about to be deleted (
IssueViewFavorite,ModuleFavorite,PageFavorite, andProjectFavorite). This step is redundant because deleting the models will remove all their fields automatically.You can simplify the migration by omitting the
RemoveFieldoperations for these models.Also applies to: 44-67, 72-95, 100-119
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
- apiserver/plane/db/migrations/0081_alter_issueviewfavorite_unique_together_and_more.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/init.py (3 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/cycle.py (0 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/module.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/page.py (0 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/project.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/view.py (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/cycle.py
- apiserver/plane/db/models/page.py
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/module.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff
apiserver/plane/db/models/__init__.py
5-5:
.cycle.Cycleimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
5-5:
.cycle.CycleIssueimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
5-5:
.cycle.CycleUserPropertiesimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
72-72:
.view.IssueViewimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
87-87: Redefinition of unused
Pagefrom line 53Remove definition:
Page(F811)
87-87:
.page.Pageimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
87-87: Redefinition of unused
PageLogfrom line 55Remove definition:
PageLog(F811)
87-87:
.page.PageLogimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
87-87: Redefinition of unused
PageLabelfrom line 54Remove definition:
PageLabel(F811)
87-87:
.page.PageLabelimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
apiserver/plane/db/models/__init__.py (3)
72-72: Verify usage of IssueView importThe removal of
IssueViewFavoriteis consistent with the restructuring of favorites management. However, static analysis suggests thatIssueViewmight be unused.Please verify if this import is still needed elsewhere in the codebase. If it is indeed unused, consider removing it to keep the imports clean and prevent potential issues with dead code.
To verify the usage of this import, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of IssueView echo "Checking usage of IssueView:" rg --type python "IssueView(?!\w)" --glob '!apiserver/plane/db/models/__init__.py'If the script returns no results, it's safe to remove the import.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
72-72:
.view.IssueViewimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
Line range hint
1-108: Final review summaryThe changes in this file align with the PR objectives of restructuring how favorites are managed. The removal of favorite-related imports is consistent across different modules. However, there are a few areas that could use some attention:
- Potential unused imports from the cycle and view modules.
- Redundant imports from the page module.
To ensure the cleanest possible import structure, I recommend the following steps:
- Verify the usage of potentially unused imports as suggested in the previous comments.
- Remove the redundant page module imports.
- After making these changes, run a final check to ensure no new issues are introduced.
You can use the following script to perform a final verification of the import structure:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the import structure of the __init__.py file echo "Checking for unused imports:" ruff check apiserver/plane/db/models/__init__.py --select F401 echo "Checking for duplicate imports:" ruff check apiserver/plane/db/models/__init__.py --select F811This will help ensure that all imports are necessary and not duplicated.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
2-2:
.api.APIActivityLogimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
2-2:
.api.APITokenimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
3-3:
.asset.FileAssetimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
4-4:
.base.BaseModelimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
5-5:
.cycle.Cycleimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
5-5:
.cycle.CycleIssueimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
5-5:
.cycle.CycleUserPropertiesimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
8-8:
.draft.DraftIssueimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
8-8:
.draft.DraftIssueAssigneeimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
8-8:
.draft.DraftIssueLabelimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
8-8:
.draft.DraftIssueModuleimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
8-8:
.draft.DraftIssueCycleimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
5-5: Verify usage of cycle module importsThe removal of
CycleFavoriteis consistent with the restructuring of favorites management. However, static analysis suggests thatCycle,CycleIssue, andCycleUserPropertiesmight be unused.Please verify if these imports are still needed elsewhere in the codebase. If they are indeed unused, consider removing them to keep the imports clean and prevent potential issues with dead code.
To verify the usage of these imports, you can run the following script:
If the script returns no results for any of these classes, it's safe to remove the corresponding import.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
5-5:
.cycle.Cycleimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
5-5:
.cycle.CycleIssueimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
5-5:
.cycle.CycleUserPropertiesimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
apiserver/plane/db/models/view.py (2)
Line range hint
1-55: Address implications of removingIssueViewFavoriteclass.The removal of the
IssueViewFavoriteclass indicates a significant change in how favorites are managed in the application. While this change is not visible in the provided code snippet, it's important to address its implications.Please consider the following points:
Ensure there's a migration strategy in place for existing favorites data. If this data needs to be preserved, consider how it will be transferred or handled in the new system.
Update any views, serializers, API endpoints, and other components that previously interacted with the
IssueViewFavoritemodel. This includes removing or modifying any code that references this model.Review and update the documentation related to favorites functionality, reflecting the new approach to managing favorites (if any).
If favorites functionality is being replaced by a new system, ensure that the new implementation is thoroughly tested and provides equivalent or improved functionality.
To help identify areas that might need updates, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify potential areas affected by the removal of IssueViewFavorite # Test: Search for IssueViewFavorite usage across the project echo "Searching for IssueViewFavorite usage:" rg --type python "IssueViewFavorite" -g "!*/migrations/*" # Test: Check for any remaining migrations related to IssueViewFavorite echo "Checking for IssueViewFavorite migrations:" rg --type python "IssueViewFavorite" -g "*/migrations/*"Please provide more context on how favorites will be managed going forward, or if this functionality is being deprecated entirely.
55-55: Approve addition ofis_lockedfield with suggestions.The addition of the
is_lockedfield to theIssueViewmodel is a good enhancement. It allows for the implementation of a view locking feature, which can be useful for preserving important or frequently used views.Consider the following suggestions:
- Update any existing queries, forms, and API endpoints that interact with the
IssueViewmodel to handle this new field appropriately.- Add documentation explaining the purpose and usage of this new feature, including any UI changes that might be necessary to support view locking.
- Consider adding a migration to set the initial value of
is_lockedfor existing records, if necessary.To ensure all necessary updates have been made, you can run the following script:
apiserver/plane/db/models/project.py (2)
184-186: LGTM: Improved readability ofworkspacefield definition.The multi-line format for the
workspacefield improves code readability without changing functionality. This change adheres to PEP 8 style guidelines for line length.
Line range hint
1-328: Summary of changes
- The
workspacefield inProjectBaseModelhas been reformatted for better readability.- The deprecated
ProjectFavoriteclass has been removed.- There's a minor formatting change in the
ProjectIdentifierclass.Overall, these changes improve code readability and maintainability without introducing new functionality. Please ensure that the removal of
ProjectFavoritedoesn't have unintended consequences in other parts of the codebase.apiserver/plane/db/migrations/0081_alter_issueviewfavorite_unique_together_and_more.py (1)
120-129: Ensure new fields inIssueTypehandle existing data appropriatelyAdding
external_idandexternal_sourceto theIssueTypemodel without default values could impact existing records if the application or database expects these fields to be non-null. Although the fields allownull=Trueandblank=True, it's important to verify that this change doesn't introduce issues in data integrity or application logic.Please confirm that existing instances of
IssueTypeare compatible with these new fields and that the application handles cases where these fields arenull.
| @@ -87,7 +84,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| from .importer import Importer | |||
|
|
|||
| from .page import Page, PageLog, PageFavorite, PageLabel | |||
| from .page import Page, PageLog, PageLabel | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove redundant page module imports
The imports of Page, PageLog, and PageLabel on this line are redundant as they are already imported earlier in the file (around lines 53-55).
To clean up the imports and avoid potential confusion, please remove this line entirely. Here's the suggested change:
- from .page import Page, PageLog, PageLabelThis will help maintain a cleaner and more organized import structure.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| from .page import Page, PageLog, PageLabel |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff
87-87: Redefinition of unused
Pagefrom line 53Remove definition:
Page(F811)
87-87:
.page.Pageimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
87-87: Redefinition of unused
PageLogfrom line 55Remove definition:
PageLog(F811)
87-87:
.page.PageLogimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
87-87: Redefinition of unused
PageLabelfrom line 54Remove definition:
PageLabel(F811)
87-87:
.page.PageLabelimported but unused; consider removing, adding to__all__, or using a redundant alias(F401)
| migrations.DeleteModel( | ||
| name="CycleFavorite", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.DeleteModel( | ||
| name="IssueViewFavorite", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.DeleteModel( | ||
| name="ModuleFavorite", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.DeleteModel( | ||
| name="PageFavorite", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.DeleteModel( | ||
| name="ProjectFavorite", | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential data loss from deleting models
Deleting models CycleFavorite, IssueViewFavorite, ModuleFavorite, PageFavorite, and ProjectFavorite will permanently remove all associated data. If this data is still needed or valuable for analytics, user experience, or compliance purposes, consider performing a data migration to archive or transfer the data before deletion.
Would you like assistance in creating a data migration to preserve the existing data before dropping these models?
sriramveeraghanta
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 10
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- apiserver/plane/db/migrations/0081_remove_globalview_created_by_and_more.py (1 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/page.py (0 hunks)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/view.py (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- apiserver/plane/db/models/page.py
- apiserver/plane/db/models/view.py
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apiserver/plane/db/migrations/0081_remove_globalview_created_by_and_more.py (2)
166-186: Confirm that deleting models does not impact data integrityDeleting models like
CycleFavorite,GlobalView, etc., could impact existing data and relationships.
- Data Backup: Ensure that any important data in these models has been backed up or migrated if necessary.
- Foreign Key Constraints: Check for any models that might have foreign key relationships to these models.
Run the following script to identify potential foreign key dependencies:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify models that reference the deleted models. # Test: Search for foreign key relationships. Expect: No remaining references. grep -rE '(ForeignKey|OneToOneField|ManyToManyField)\(.*(CycleFavorite|GlobalView|IssueViewFavorite|ModuleFavorite|PageBlock|PageFavorite|ProjectFavorite)' apiserver/plane/db/models/
156-165: Ensure new fields inissuetypemodel have appropriate attributesThe fields
external_idandexternal_sourceare added to theissuetypemodel. Since these fields might be used for integration with external systems, consider the following:
- Max Length: Is 255 characters sufficient for
external_idandexternal_source? Ensure this length accommodates all expected external identifiers.- Indexing: If queries will be performed frequently on these fields, consider adding indexes to improve query performance.
Run the following script to check for any existing usages that might be impacted:
| migrations.AlterUniqueTogether( | ||
| name="issueviewfavorite", | ||
| unique_together=None, | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Unnecessary AlterUniqueTogether before model deletion
The unique constraint for IssueViewFavorite is being altered before the model is deleted. Since the model is being deleted, modifying its constraints is redundant.
Consider removing the AlterUniqueTogether operation for IssueViewFavorite. This streamlines the migration and prevents unnecessary steps.
Apply this diff to remove the operation:
- migrations.AlterUniqueTogether(
- name="issueviewfavorite",
- unique_together=None,
- ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.AlterUniqueTogether( | |
| name="issueviewfavorite", | |
| unique_together=None, | |
| ), |
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pagefavorite", | ||
| name="created_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pagefavorite", | ||
| name="page", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pagefavorite", | ||
| name="project", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pagefavorite", | ||
| name="updated_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pagefavorite", | ||
| name="user", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pagefavorite", | ||
| name="workspace", | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Redundant field removals from PageFavorite
Fields are being removed before deleting PageFavorite.
Exclude the RemoveField operations for PageFavorite.
Apply this diff:
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pagefavorite",
- name="created_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pagefavorite",
- name="page",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pagefavorite",
- name="project",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pagefavorite",
- name="updated_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pagefavorite",
- name="user",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pagefavorite",
- name="workspace",
- ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pagefavorite", | |
| name="created_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pagefavorite", | |
| name="page", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pagefavorite", | |
| name="project", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pagefavorite", | |
| name="updated_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pagefavorite", | |
| name="user", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pagefavorite", | |
| name="workspace", | |
| ), |
| migrations.AlterUniqueTogether( | ||
| name="pagefavorite", | ||
| unique_together=None, | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Unnecessary AlterUniqueTogether before model deletion
For PageFavorite, altering unique constraints before deleting the model is not needed.
Remove the AlterUniqueTogether operation for PageFavorite.
Apply this diff:
- migrations.AlterUniqueTogether(
- name="pagefavorite",
- unique_together=None,
- ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.AlterUniqueTogether( | |
| name="pagefavorite", | |
| unique_together=None, | |
| ), |
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pageblock", | ||
| name="created_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pageblock", | ||
| name="issue", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pageblock", | ||
| name="page", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pageblock", | ||
| name="project", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pageblock", | ||
| name="updated_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="pageblock", | ||
| name="workspace", | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Redundant field removals from PageBlock
Fields are being individually removed from PageBlock prior to deletion.
Remove the RemoveField operations for PageBlock.
Apply this diff:
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pageblock",
- name="created_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pageblock",
- name="issue",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pageblock",
- name="page",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pageblock",
- name="project",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pageblock",
- name="updated_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="pageblock",
- name="workspace",
- ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pageblock", | |
| name="created_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pageblock", | |
| name="issue", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pageblock", | |
| name="page", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pageblock", | |
| name="project", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pageblock", | |
| name="updated_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="pageblock", | |
| name="workspace", | |
| ), |
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="globalview", | ||
| name="created_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="globalview", | ||
| name="updated_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="globalview", | ||
| name="workspace", | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Redundant field removals before model deletion
The fields from GlobalView are being removed individually before the model is deleted later in the migration. This is unnecessary as deleting the model will automatically remove all its fields.
Consider simplifying the migration by removing the individual RemoveField operations for GlobalView and directly deleting the model. This reduces the migration steps and avoids potential issues during rollback.
Apply this diff to remove the redundant operations:
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="globalview",
- name="created_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="globalview",
- name="updated_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="globalview",
- name="workspace",
- ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="globalview", | |
| name="created_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="globalview", | |
| name="updated_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="globalview", | |
| name="workspace", | |
| ), |
| migrations.AlterUniqueTogether( | ||
| name="modulefavorite", | ||
| unique_together=None, | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Unnecessary AlterUniqueTogether before model deletion
The same issue applies to ModuleFavorite. Altering unique constraints before deleting the model is redundant.
Remove the AlterUniqueTogether operation for ModuleFavorite.
Apply this diff:
- migrations.AlterUniqueTogether(
- name="modulefavorite",
- unique_together=None,
- ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.AlterUniqueTogether( | |
| name="modulefavorite", | |
| unique_together=None, | |
| ), |
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="modulefavorite", | ||
| name="created_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="modulefavorite", | ||
| name="module", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="modulefavorite", | ||
| name="project", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="modulefavorite", | ||
| name="updated_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="modulefavorite", | ||
| name="user", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="modulefavorite", | ||
| name="workspace", | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Redundant field removals from ModuleFavorite
Fields are being removed before deleting ModuleFavorite.
Omit the RemoveField operations for ModuleFavorite.
Apply this diff:
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="modulefavorite",
- name="created_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="modulefavorite",
- name="module",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="modulefavorite",
- name="project",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="modulefavorite",
- name="updated_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="modulefavorite",
- name="user",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="modulefavorite",
- name="workspace",
- ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="modulefavorite", | |
| name="created_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="modulefavorite", | |
| name="module", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="modulefavorite", | |
| name="project", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="modulefavorite", | |
| name="updated_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="modulefavorite", | |
| name="user", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="modulefavorite", | |
| name="workspace", | |
| ), |
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="projectfavorite", | ||
| name="created_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="projectfavorite", | ||
| name="project", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="projectfavorite", | ||
| name="updated_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="projectfavorite", | ||
| name="user", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="projectfavorite", | ||
| name="workspace", | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Redundant field removals from ProjectFavorite
Fields are being removed from ProjectFavorite before its deletion.
Remove the RemoveField operations for ProjectFavorite.
Apply this diff:
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="projectfavorite",
- name="created_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="projectfavorite",
- name="project",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="projectfavorite",
- name="updated_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="projectfavorite",
- name="user",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="projectfavorite",
- name="workspace",
- ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="projectfavorite", | |
| name="created_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="projectfavorite", | |
| name="project", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="projectfavorite", | |
| name="updated_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="projectfavorite", | |
| name="user", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="projectfavorite", | |
| name="workspace", | |
| ), |
| migrations.AlterUniqueTogether( | ||
| name="projectfavorite", | ||
| unique_together=None, | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Unnecessary AlterUniqueTogether before model deletion
The AlterUniqueTogether operation for ProjectFavorite is unnecessary before model deletion.
Remove this operation to simplify the migration.
Apply this diff:
- migrations.AlterUniqueTogether(
- name="projectfavorite",
- unique_together=None,
- ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.AlterUniqueTogether( | |
| name="projectfavorite", | |
| unique_together=None, | |
| ), |
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | ||
| name="created_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | ||
| name="project", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | ||
| name="updated_by", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | ||
| name="user", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | ||
| name="view", | ||
| ), | ||
| migrations.RemoveField( | ||
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | ||
| name="workspace", | ||
| ), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Redundant field removals from IssueViewFavorite
Similar to GlobalView, fields are being removed from IssueViewFavorite before deleting the model. This is unnecessary.
Remove the individual RemoveField operations for IssueViewFavorite and proceed directly to deleting the model.
Apply this diff:
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="issueviewfavorite",
- name="created_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="issueviewfavorite",
- name="project",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="issueviewfavorite",
- name="updated_by",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="issueviewfavorite",
- name="user",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="issueviewfavorite",
- name="view",
- ),
- migrations.RemoveField(
- model_name="issueviewfavorite",
- name="workspace",
- ),📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | |
| name="created_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | |
| name="project", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | |
| name="updated_by", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | |
| name="user", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | |
| name="view", | |
| ), | |
| migrations.RemoveField( | |
| model_name="issueviewfavorite", | |
| name="workspace", | |
| ), |
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
external_idandexternal_sourcefields to the issue type model for enhanced data storage.is_lockedfield to theIssueViewfor improved view management.Bug Fixes
Deprecations
CycleFavorite,ModuleFavorite,PageFavorite, andProjectFavorite, indicating a restructuring of favorites management.GlobalViewandIssueViewFavorite, streamlining view functionalities.Documentation