Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-41705: Fix RemoteButler import #905

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2023
Merged

DM-41705: Fix RemoteButler import #905

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 15, 2023

Conversation

dhirving
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist

  • ran Jenkins
  • added a release note for user-visible changes to doc/changes

Removed an implicit dependency on "fastapi" when loading the RemoteButler class.  This was causing RemoteButler import to fail on RSP.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (c817402) 87.72% compared to head (8bcb19c) 87.72%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #905      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.72%   87.72%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         285      285              
  Lines       36744    36743       -1     
  Branches     7690     7690              
==========================================
- Hits        32233    32232       -1     
  Misses       3340     3340              
  Partials     1171     1171              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dhirving dhirving marked this pull request as ready for review November 15, 2023 00:14
Copy link
Member

@timj timj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks okay. I might quibble that server models are needed by both server and by remote butler and so putting them in either server or remote_butler seems wrong but I have no better place to suggest (previously they were treated as a shared model in core).

@dhirving dhirving merged commit e63b081 into main Nov 15, 2023
17 checks passed
@dhirving dhirving deleted the tickets/DM-41705 branch November 15, 2023 20:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants