Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tickets/DM-48170: Put user lab workload into its own pool #4032

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Dec 26, 2024

Conversation

athornton
Copy link
Member

Segregate user lab workload.

@athornton athornton marked this pull request as draft December 23, 2024 16:07
@athornton
Copy link
Member Author

Must not be merged until lsst/idf_deploy#549 is merged (so pods have some place to go)

@athornton athornton marked this pull request as ready for review December 23, 2024 22:08
tolerations:
- key: "nublado.lsst.io/permitted"
operator: "Exists"
effect: "NoExecute"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I should've asked this on https://github.com/lsst/idf_deploy/pull/549/files, but do we want a NoSchedule taint on these user-lab-pool nodes too (and a matching toleration here?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's moot, but NoExecute is a superset of NoSchedule. So I don't think so.

@athornton athornton added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 26, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 0c419b2 Dec 26, 2024
7 checks passed
@athornton athornton deleted the tickets/DM-48170 branch December 26, 2024 22:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants