Skip to content

bump base upper bound to <4.19 #90

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2023
Merged

bump base upper bound to <4.19 #90

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2023

Conversation

mitchellwrosen
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@mitchellwrosen
Copy link
Contributor Author

CI seems busted. 😢

@treeowl
Copy link
Collaborator

treeowl commented Mar 16, 2023

We'll have to see if it recovers or if we need to regenerate with haskell-ci to catch up with whatever.

@mitchellwrosen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sounds good. I went ahead and added another commit here just to see what this looks like with a haskell-ci github pqueue.cabal-generated CI config. We can remove that commit before merging if we'd like.

@treeowl
Copy link
Collaborator

treeowl commented Mar 16, 2023

We already have a Haskell CI workflow. Let's see what CI does this time, but if the new one works, you should revert that commit and use haskell-ci regenerate instead to replace the old one instead of adding another.

@mitchellwrosen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sure; I'll just revert the commits then. I saw the existing CI file, but it looked hand-written, and I thought haskell-ci would be an improvement.

Feel free to add more commits to this PR, or not - I'm stepping away from it for now.

@treeowl
Copy link
Collaborator

treeowl commented Mar 16, 2023

Sorry if I got it wrong. I was just trying to advise. It looks like you did a good thing....

@treeowl
Copy link
Collaborator

treeowl commented Mar 16, 2023

It looks like I did get it wrong. If that was from haskell-ci, it was way too old. Ugh. Sorry.

@mitchellwrosen
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this PR is good to merge; here's one green run from history: https://github.com/lspitzner/pqueue/actions/runs/4433666369

To fix CI I simply removed 7.10.3 from Tested-With, as it seems ghcup has trouble installing that one. But that can be another PR.

@treeowl treeowl merged commit 3a45033 into lspitzner:master Mar 16, 2023
@treeowl
Copy link
Collaborator

treeowl commented Mar 16, 2023

Okay, thanks a lot. I'll try to remember to do the CI thing and make a release in the morning.

@mitchellwrosen
Copy link
Contributor Author

No problem, thank you!

@treeowl
Copy link
Collaborator

treeowl commented Mar 16, 2023

It looks like whatever problem you encountered with 7.10.3 was temporary (maybe a server issue or something). I didn't have any trouble with it in #91, so I guess we'll keep supporting 7.10.3 a bit longer.

@konsumlamm
Copy link
Collaborator

konsumlamm commented Mar 16, 2023

It looks like whatever problem you encountered with 7.10.3 was temporary (maybe a server issue or something). I didn't have any trouble with it in #91, so I guess we'll keep supporting 7.10.3 a bit longer.

I think the issue is that installing 7.10.3 via GHCup no longer works (at least by default), which is what the old CI used (via haskell/actions/setup). The new CI uses hvr-ppa instead.

@ocharles
Copy link

ocharles commented Aug 1, 2023

Could we get this released to Hackage, or at least a Hackage revision?

@treeowl
Copy link
Collaborator

treeowl commented Aug 1, 2023

Yeah, let's just make a release and deal with the remaining equality question later.

@ocharles
Copy link

ocharles commented Aug 1, 2023

The what? I don't see any mention of equality here?

@konsumlamm
Copy link
Collaborator

The equality question is #78. See also #121.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants