P1: Recommendations for alternative approaches to conceptualizing, measuring and discussing language experience in research practices
- Cheng, L. S. P., Burgess, D., Vernooij, N., Solís-Barroso, C., McDermott, A., & Namboodiripad, S. (2021). The Problematic Concept of Native Speaker in Psycholinguistics: Replacing Vague and Harmful Terminology With Inclusive and Accurate Measures. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.715843
P2: Exploratory data analysis assessing categorical vs. continuous measures of language experience in a dataset of Hindi-Urdu speakers.
- Cheng, L. S. P., Kramer, M. A., Upreti, R., & Namboodiripad, S. (2022). Moving past indirect proxies for language experience: ‘Native speaker’ and residential history are poor predictors of language behavior. In J. Culbertson, A. Perfors, H. Rabagliati & V. Ramenzoni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 44th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1p59b35f
P3: Survey to assess language experience of self-identified mono- and multi-linguals in a unified, nuanced, and gradient manner.
- In development