[rom_ctrl,dv] Slightly tweak an exclusion annotation #26331
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The excluded line is a continuous assignment. If the right hand side happens to be constant then it will never be marked as executing (and we don't care!) I wrongly suggested that we should have an assertion saying that it *was* constant. But that's wrong, and was removed by a920ad2. Tweak the text to avoid things being confusing next time. Signed-off-by: Rupert Swarbrick <[email protected]>
a-will
approved these changes
Feb 17, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The excluded line is a continuous assignment. If the right hand side happens to be constant then it will never be marked as executing (and we don't care!)
I wrongly suggested that we should have an assertion saying that it was constant. But that's wrong, and was removed by a920ad2. Tweak the text to avoid things being confusing next time.
This is a follow-up after #26310.