Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update the comment in environment_check_monitor.go #3456

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 11, 2025

Conversation

derekbit
Copy link
Member

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Issue longhorn/longhorn#10106

What this PR does / why we need it:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Additional documentation or context

@derekbit derekbit requested a review from innobead January 11, 2025 09:13
@derekbit derekbit self-assigned this Jan 11, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 11, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves a minor documentation update in the environment_check_monitor.go file. The change expands a comment within the syncPackagesInstalled method to provide more clarity about the scenarios where environment checks are skipped. Specifically, the comment now explicitly mentions two conditions: when the OS is unknown to Longhorn and when the OS already has all required packages installed, such as Harvester.

Changes

File Change Summary
controller/monitor/environment_check_monitor.go Updated comment in syncPackagesInstalled method to clarify environment check skipping conditions

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Recognize Harvester as a known OS [#10106]

The change aligns with the improvement request by explicitly mentioning Harvester in the comment, indicating recognition of the platform in the environment check logic. While this is a documentation update, it provides clarity about Harvester's handling in the Longhorn environment check process.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c3f39a6 and e2faa99.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • controller/monitor/environment_check_monitor.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • controller/monitor/environment_check_monitor.go
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Build binaries
  • GitHub Check: Summary

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@innobead innobead enabled auto-merge (rebase) January 11, 2025 17:16
@innobead innobead disabled auto-merge January 11, 2025 17:30
@innobead innobead merged commit f9fcc3f into longhorn:master Jan 11, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@derekbit
Copy link
Member Author

@mergify backport v1.8.x v1.7.x

Copy link

mergify bot commented Jan 12, 2025

backport v1.8.x v1.7.x

✅ Backports have been created

derekbit added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 20, 2025
…3456) (#3462)

Longhorn 10106

Signed-off-by: Derek Su <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit f9fcc3f)

Signed-off-by: Raphanus Lo <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Derek Su <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Raphanus Lo <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants