Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(coderabbit): no need to review vendor files #1265

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

derekbit
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Derek Su [email protected]

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Issue #

What this PR does / why we need it:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Additional documentation or context

@derekbit derekbit self-assigned this Oct 22, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request introduce a new path_filters section under the reviews key in the .coderabbit.yaml configuration file. This section specifies three patterns to exclude certain files and directories from the review process: !vendor/**, !go.mod, and !go.sum. The existing configuration structure remains unchanged, and no other keys or values are modified.

Changes

File Change Summary
.coderabbit.yaml Added path_filters under reviews with values:
- !vendor/**
- !go.mod
- !go.sum

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • innobead

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ae18009 and f952082.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.coderabbit.yaml (1)

18-21: LGTM! Consider adding explanatory comments and updating PR description.

The addition of path_filters to exclude vendor files, go.mod, and go.sum from reviews is appropriate and aligns with the PR title. The YAML syntax is correct, and this change will help streamline the review process by focusing on project-specific code changes.

Consider adding a comment in the YAML file to explain the purpose of these exclusions. For example:

reviews:
  path_filters:
    # Exclude vendor files and Go module files from reviews
    - "!vendor/**"
    - "!go.mod"
    - "!go.sum"

It's recommended to update the PR description with more details about the rationale behind excluding these files from reviews. This will provide better context for reviewers and future reference.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant