Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

new lba models -- porting from the other PR #58

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jan 7, 2025
Merged

Conversation

krishnbera
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@AlexanderFengler AlexanderFengler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, leaving some minor comments.

@@ -568,6 +568,55 @@ def boundary_config_to_function_params(boundary_config: dict) -> dict:
"n_particles": 3,
"simulator": cssm.lba_angle,
},
"lba_angle_3_v2": {
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We might want to consistently keep the lba naming convention: A , b instead of z and a?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for now keeping the a/z naming since it will break a lot of current data analysis pipelines (will look into it again soon after).

ssms/config/config.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/test_simulator.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AlexanderFengler
Copy link
Collaborator

@krishnbera ping on this

Copy link
Collaborator

@AlexanderFengler AlexanderFengler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks ok to me now, (apart from still not being a fan of the v1 etc. naming conventions).

Just some merge conflicts seem to be remaining here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@AlexanderFengler AlexanderFengler left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@AlexanderFengler AlexanderFengler merged commit 826234d into main Jan 7, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants